- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Agreed that the draft article is superior, and will be moving it to this title
Flexity once this is deleted.
The Bushranger
One ping only 07:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Flexity (tram)
- Flexity (tram) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Do we have sufficient references to prove NOTABILITY? <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 03:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
-
Comment: An improved version of this article can be found at
Draft:Bombardier Flexity, which has been declined twice due to the lack of sufficient
reliable sources.
<<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (
talk) 03:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC) - Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:53, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Replace This parent article is better set out in Draft:Bombardier Flexity. I don't understand why that was rejected. Many of the related articles have overwhelming references to establish notability. Delete and replace with the draft article. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 22:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Replace with draft article per Secondarywaltz. I see no problem with sources used in the draft. Mjroots ( talk) 17:33, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Agreed that the draft article is superior, and will be moving it to this title
Flexity once this is deleted.
The Bushranger
One ping only 07:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Flexity (tram)
- Flexity (tram) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Do we have sufficient references to prove NOTABILITY? <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 03:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
-
Comment: An improved version of this article can be found at
Draft:Bombardier Flexity, which has been declined twice due to the lack of sufficient
reliable sources.
<<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (
talk) 03:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:53, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Replace This parent article is better set out in Draft:Bombardier Flexity. I don't understand why that was rejected. Many of the related articles have overwhelming references to establish notability. Delete and replace with the draft article. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 22:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Replace with draft article per Secondarywaltz. I see no problem with sources used in the draft. Mjroots ( talk) 17:33, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.