The result was Keep (NAC) RMHED ( talk) 19:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability. There is no evidence that the case has set any kind of precedence, or of coverage by reliable sources to allow it to pass WP:GNG. Ironholds ( talk) 19:33, 21 November 2009 (UTC) reply
OK, I just went and did a total rewrite, based on the sources cited here and in the article. Look at it again and see if you think it now qualifies for a Keep. -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)MelanieN reply
The result was Keep (NAC) RMHED ( talk) 19:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability. There is no evidence that the case has set any kind of precedence, or of coverage by reliable sources to allow it to pass WP:GNG. Ironholds ( talk) 19:33, 21 November 2009 (UTC) reply
OK, I just went and did a total rewrite, based on the sources cited here and in the article. Look at it again and see if you think it now qualifies for a Keep. -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)MelanieN reply