- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
FiXT
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- FiXT ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fluff piece, sources are unreliable, some are Twitter disguised as something else, Facebook, etc. Doesn't pass GNG by the most basic criteria, having multiple reliable sources cover them in a significant way. Lot of minor stuff, nothing that passes WP:RS. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:29, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Internet. jp× g 03:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - there were a lot of primary sources used, which I cleaned up. I have found additional sources that are good. Check THIS and THIS. A number of bands on teh lable also have Wiki pages, so it seems to be a popular label. Zeddedm ( talk) 23:31, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more round.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 01:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- (Weak) Delete: The Hawkeye piece is good, but under WP:NCORP there should be multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources for a company to be notable and I don't see evidence of more than that one, an indication of non-notability (especially a US-based modern-day company). I wouldn't call the edm.com piece significant coverage about the company itself (it's a few paragraphs about its subsidiary). I'm also slightly skeptical of its independence given [1], which states it covers the music of labels it partners with and I'm not sure of how to check whether FiXT has partnered with them. The rest of the sources cited in the article are either interviews, sourced to the company, non-significant, or is a press release. As to its bands, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED (the label may not be notable even if some of its artists are). I'm open to being convinced otherwise. — Danre98( talk^ contribs) 20:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Sufficient number of artists and media coverage to meet WP:MUSIC's sense of one of the more important indie labels, which is a better yardstick than NCORP. 04:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
FiXT
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- FiXT ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fluff piece, sources are unreliable, some are Twitter disguised as something else, Facebook, etc. Doesn't pass GNG by the most basic criteria, having multiple reliable sources cover them in a significant way. Lot of minor stuff, nothing that passes WP:RS. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:29, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Internet. jp× g 03:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - there were a lot of primary sources used, which I cleaned up. I have found additional sources that are good. Check THIS and THIS. A number of bands on teh lable also have Wiki pages, so it seems to be a popular label. Zeddedm ( talk) 23:31, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more round.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 01:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- (Weak) Delete: The Hawkeye piece is good, but under WP:NCORP there should be multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources for a company to be notable and I don't see evidence of more than that one, an indication of non-notability (especially a US-based modern-day company). I wouldn't call the edm.com piece significant coverage about the company itself (it's a few paragraphs about its subsidiary). I'm also slightly skeptical of its independence given [1], which states it covers the music of labels it partners with and I'm not sure of how to check whether FiXT has partnered with them. The rest of the sources cited in the article are either interviews, sourced to the company, non-significant, or is a press release. As to its bands, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED (the label may not be notable even if some of its artists are). I'm open to being convinced otherwise. — Danre98( talk^ contribs) 20:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Sufficient number of artists and media coverage to meet WP:MUSIC's sense of one of the more important indie labels, which is a better yardstick than NCORP. 04:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.