- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Owen× ☎ 20:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Felipe Leal (influencer)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Felipe Leal (influencer) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of an "influencer", not properly sourced as meeting inclusion criteria for internet personalities. The only attempted claim of notability here is that he exists, which is not automatically enough in and of itself, and the article is referenced entirely to unreliable sources that are not support for notability, with not one bit of reliable source coverage about him shown at all. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform, and simply existing as a self-appointed "influencer" is not inherently notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced properly. Bearcat ( talk) 16:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Internet, and Brazil. Bearcat ( talk) 16:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Its also a case of WP:RECENTISM, the influencer is only notable in his bubble of followers. Svartner ( talk) 10:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Owen× ☎ 20:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Felipe Leal (influencer)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Felipe Leal (influencer) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of an "influencer", not properly sourced as meeting inclusion criteria for internet personalities. The only attempted claim of notability here is that he exists, which is not automatically enough in and of itself, and the article is referenced entirely to unreliable sources that are not support for notability, with not one bit of reliable source coverage about him shown at all. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform, and simply existing as a self-appointed "influencer" is not inherently notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced properly. Bearcat ( talk) 16:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Internet, and Brazil. Bearcat ( talk) 16:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Its also a case of WP:RECENTISM, the influencer is only notable in his bubble of followers. Svartner ( talk) 10:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.