The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - The genre term is meaningless until it is widely discussed by professional music journalists and other reliable sources. This one is equivalent to an inside joke among scenesters, and does not qualify for an encyclopedia. Nobody has ever used the term except a few bands and some of their fans. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 13:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Hardly a genre, more in in-joke among a very few musicians. Saying the sources are unimpressive is a gross understatement.
TheLongTone (
talk)
14:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Tally Hall: The term is at the top of their page as their self-described genre, so there is a very valid redirect. I am not opposed to a small section about it about on their page, either, but sourcing currently is lacking for that. I would also preemptively say to keep the page starred in case we need to lock the redirect.
Why? I Ask (
talk)
13:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Tally Hall. If ever coverage comes along that isn't the crap this article currently has then a section on that band's article would be appropriate, but I see no point in a merge vote based on the available material.
QuietHere (
talk)
22:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: It's looking pretty
WP:SNOWy for a redirect, so I went ahead and did it. No reason to have someone else comment the same thing. If someone opposes, then go ahead and undo my edit. If not, then please close.
Why? I Ask (
talk)
02:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - The genre term is meaningless until it is widely discussed by professional music journalists and other reliable sources. This one is equivalent to an inside joke among scenesters, and does not qualify for an encyclopedia. Nobody has ever used the term except a few bands and some of their fans. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 13:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Hardly a genre, more in in-joke among a very few musicians. Saying the sources are unimpressive is a gross understatement.
TheLongTone (
talk)
14:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Tally Hall: The term is at the top of their page as their self-described genre, so there is a very valid redirect. I am not opposed to a small section about it about on their page, either, but sourcing currently is lacking for that. I would also preemptively say to keep the page starred in case we need to lock the redirect.
Why? I Ask (
talk)
13:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Tally Hall. If ever coverage comes along that isn't the crap this article currently has then a section on that band's article would be appropriate, but I see no point in a merge vote based on the available material.
QuietHere (
talk)
22:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: It's looking pretty
WP:SNOWy for a redirect, so I went ahead and did it. No reason to have someone else comment the same thing. If someone opposes, then go ahead and undo my edit. If not, then please close.
Why? I Ask (
talk)
02:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.