The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 10:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band. The article makes some grandiose claims: they perform "all over the world", "started to make it big", "praised by many", "popular", "highly professional and accomplished musician[s]", "popularity continuously ... on the rise", "loving tribute ... has amazed audiences around the world", "across the globe", and of course, "please visit the official website". But let's try to sweep away some of this puffery. First, none of the sources is independent: of 15 links, 7 are the band's own site and 8 are self-published sites or blogs. And second, this "popular" band has just 130 Google hits - not much real-world confirmation of that "popularity". Obvious self-promotion here, so delete. Biruitorul Talk 05:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC) reply
— MissPijon ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 10:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band. The article makes some grandiose claims: they perform "all over the world", "started to make it big", "praised by many", "popular", "highly professional and accomplished musician[s]", "popularity continuously ... on the rise", "loving tribute ... has amazed audiences around the world", "across the globe", and of course, "please visit the official website". But let's try to sweep away some of this puffery. First, none of the sources is independent: of 15 links, 7 are the band's own site and 8 are self-published sites or blogs. And second, this "popular" band has just 130 Google hits - not much real-world confirmation of that "popularity". Obvious self-promotion here, so delete. Biruitorul Talk 05:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC) reply
— MissPijon ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.