- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
FC Rapid București strip
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- FC Rapid București strip ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As per WP:NOTGALLERY and previous consensus for this type of article.
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eintracht Frankfurt kits
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VfB Stuttgart kits
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFC Ajax kit history
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of Bradford City kits
Also might be WP:OR.
Spiderone 11:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 11:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: As per my reasoning at Talk:FC Rapid București#Proposed Merger. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 11:56, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - a brief summary of the club's colours should be in the main article, but there is no need for a separate article showing every slight variation on the same basic colour scheme down the years...... -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 12:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Merge - As I proposed, I think this should just be merged into the main team page. I haven't had a chance to do so yet but let me know if anyone has any objection that. Otherwise, I'll do that in a few days.
DocFreeman24 (
talk)
13:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have an objection if what you plan is to literally move all the content into the main club article. There is no need for 40+ graphics depicting very slight variations on the same basic colours in the main article. If you plan to summarise the club's colours in two or three sentences of prose, that's fine --
ChrisTheDude (
talk)
13:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, it seems wasteful to me to just delete the content rather than merge it in to the page about the team. But look, the consensus seems to be that this page fails notability generally and should just be deleted. So that's fine and I don't feel strongly about merging vs. deleting. I was, I believe, the first person to suggest that this content didn't deserve its own page. I proposed merging simply because that's the preferred alternative to deletion. But like I said, I don't feel strongly so if the consensus is to delete rather than merge, that's fine with me. DocFreeman24 ( talk) 22:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have an objection if what you plan is to literally move all the content into the main club article. There is no need for 40+ graphics depicting very slight variations on the same basic colours in the main article. If you plan to summarise the club's colours in two or three sentences of prose, that's fine --
ChrisTheDude (
talk)
13:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, what is there to merge? Clear consensus this content is not notable. Giant Snowman 15:47, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete (as I proposed in the merge bit, not really the right way to do it tho, so apologies for that) per WP:NOTGALLERY. It would be appropriate to show a couple of previous kits in the main article to show the traditional style and any particularly noteworthy deviations. The amount shown on the kit page is unnecessary and in fact absurd in places, check the 4 seasons of identical featureless all-maroon affairs of the early 2000s. And it hasn't been updated for 8 years. Bin. Crowsus ( talk) 19:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, per above and previous discussions on similar articles. Nigej ( talk) 17:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Devokewater (talk) 11:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per norm and also based on the previous discussions on these kind of articles. Kashmorwiki ( talk) 07:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
FC Rapid București strip
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- FC Rapid București strip ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As per WP:NOTGALLERY and previous consensus for this type of article.
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eintracht Frankfurt kits
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VfB Stuttgart kits
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFC Ajax kit history
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of Bradford City kits
Also might be WP:OR.
Spiderone 11:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 11:48, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: As per my reasoning at Talk:FC Rapid București#Proposed Merger. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 11:56, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - a brief summary of the club's colours should be in the main article, but there is no need for a separate article showing every slight variation on the same basic colour scheme down the years...... -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 12:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Merge - As I proposed, I think this should just be merged into the main team page. I haven't had a chance to do so yet but let me know if anyone has any objection that. Otherwise, I'll do that in a few days.
DocFreeman24 (
talk)
13:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have an objection if what you plan is to literally move all the content into the main club article. There is no need for 40+ graphics depicting very slight variations on the same basic colours in the main article. If you plan to summarise the club's colours in two or three sentences of prose, that's fine --
ChrisTheDude (
talk)
13:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, it seems wasteful to me to just delete the content rather than merge it in to the page about the team. But look, the consensus seems to be that this page fails notability generally and should just be deleted. So that's fine and I don't feel strongly about merging vs. deleting. I was, I believe, the first person to suggest that this content didn't deserve its own page. I proposed merging simply because that's the preferred alternative to deletion. But like I said, I don't feel strongly so if the consensus is to delete rather than merge, that's fine with me. DocFreeman24 ( talk) 22:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have an objection if what you plan is to literally move all the content into the main club article. There is no need for 40+ graphics depicting very slight variations on the same basic colours in the main article. If you plan to summarise the club's colours in two or three sentences of prose, that's fine --
ChrisTheDude (
talk)
13:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, what is there to merge? Clear consensus this content is not notable. Giant Snowman 15:47, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete (as I proposed in the merge bit, not really the right way to do it tho, so apologies for that) per WP:NOTGALLERY. It would be appropriate to show a couple of previous kits in the main article to show the traditional style and any particularly noteworthy deviations. The amount shown on the kit page is unnecessary and in fact absurd in places, check the 4 seasons of identical featureless all-maroon affairs of the early 2000s. And it hasn't been updated for 8 years. Bin. Crowsus ( talk) 19:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, per above and previous discussions on similar articles. Nigej ( talk) 17:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Devokewater (talk) 11:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per norm and also based on the previous discussions on these kind of articles. Kashmorwiki ( talk) 07:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.