The result was delete. Even though the Keeps were in the minority, I looked at the keep arguments to see if there was some strong policy-based argument which might overcome the raw numbers. Unfortunately, they were more this is important than here's the references to support WP:N, so closing this as a clear delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Single aircraft used for military displays are raarely notable and not that uncommon. Most air forces have at least one solo display team that appear at air shows and displays and like the other solo aircraft I cant see this one being notable MilborneOne ( talk) 19:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thanks FFA P-16 ( talk) 19:24, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Please have a look at the Swiss Air Force Page about the F/A-18 Hornet Solo Display [1]
Programm ( http://www.lw.admin.ch/internet/luftwaffe/de/home/aktuell/airshows.html
This are my points against deleting it.
On the other hand i like to rise the question: If single aircraft used for military displays dosent fit into the category Aerobatic teams, would it not bee good to create a category for them? ther are quite a few single aircraft "Teams" who are since years part of airshows (Ramex Delta (2 French M2000), Solo Türk (F-16) ,Belgian Air Component F-16 Solo Display Team, Rafale solo Display Team [2] HAF Demo Team [3] and so one. FFA P-16 ( talk) 19:42, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
FLORAKO ( talk) 10:01, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Have add 3-party ref [4] [5] [6] [7] FFA P-16 ( talk) 19:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
*Keep@Bejnar. But had you seen that this with theclock is not just some page, its from the Aero Club switzerland. the organisation for all interests of aviatic (civil &military) of switzerland. one is the homepage of fightersqad17 (its run by members of Sq17, not just by some fans). The page of herman keist is seen as valid source about swiss air force topics in diverse wikipedias in differend languages. And here one more
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
FFA P-16 (
talk) 06:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Even though the Keeps were in the minority, I looked at the keep arguments to see if there was some strong policy-based argument which might overcome the raw numbers. Unfortunately, they were more this is important than here's the references to support WP:N, so closing this as a clear delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Single aircraft used for military displays are raarely notable and not that uncommon. Most air forces have at least one solo display team that appear at air shows and displays and like the other solo aircraft I cant see this one being notable MilborneOne ( talk) 19:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thanks FFA P-16 ( talk) 19:24, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Please have a look at the Swiss Air Force Page about the F/A-18 Hornet Solo Display [1]
Programm ( http://www.lw.admin.ch/internet/luftwaffe/de/home/aktuell/airshows.html
This are my points against deleting it.
On the other hand i like to rise the question: If single aircraft used for military displays dosent fit into the category Aerobatic teams, would it not bee good to create a category for them? ther are quite a few single aircraft "Teams" who are since years part of airshows (Ramex Delta (2 French M2000), Solo Türk (F-16) ,Belgian Air Component F-16 Solo Display Team, Rafale solo Display Team [2] HAF Demo Team [3] and so one. FFA P-16 ( talk) 19:42, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
FLORAKO ( talk) 10:01, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Have add 3-party ref [4] [5] [6] [7] FFA P-16 ( talk) 19:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
*Keep@Bejnar. But had you seen that this with theclock is not just some page, its from the Aero Club switzerland. the organisation for all interests of aviatic (civil &military) of switzerland. one is the homepage of fightersqad17 (its run by members of Sq17, not just by some fans). The page of herman keist is seen as valid source about swiss air force topics in diverse wikipedias in differend languages. And here one more
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
FFA P-16 (
talk) 06:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)