The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No compelling, policy-backed arguments have been made for this article's inclusion. Notability is not inherited or transferred. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans // 18:11, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Is this crime victim sufficiently notable? I don't think so. (I do admit that there is a certain amount of irony in that part of the criticism of the media from her case was that she was not given enough coverage, but I do think that notability is lacking, unless we're going to start making all murder victims notable.) Delete. --
Nlu (
talk) 05:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)reply
perhaps merge to
Murder of Laci Peterson There are a lot of book hits on this one, and they invariably pair the two cases. Outright deletion doesn't seem to be the right solution to this, but I agree that an independent article is hard to justify.
Mangoe (
talk) 11:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:NOTNEWS and what should be a policy
WP:NOTTRUECRIME. Bad things happen. Newspapers cover the stories. It does not follow that this is sufficient for encyclopedic biography. My condolences to the victim's family and friends.
Carrite (
talk) 01:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)reply
weak keep - per connection willing or unwillingly to the Peterson case. should pass GNG.--
BabbaQ (
talk) 19:38, 5 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete The case was only lightly reported at the time. While there are parallels to the later Peterson case, they are not sufficiently noted in Reliable Sources (a letter from a retired politician is not a Reliable Source). Ironically, one of the arguments in favor of keeping this article (in other words, an argument for notability of the crime) is that this case did NOT receive the publicity that the Peterson case did.
[1] --
MelanieN (
talk) 00:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Although the murder in itself is not notable, it is highly relevant to the Peterson case, as well as a prominent example of
Missing white girl syndrome. People reading up on the former two would be very out of luck to not be able to read about this case. Also,
it made national news -
Cake~
talk 16:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No compelling, policy-backed arguments have been made for this article's inclusion. Notability is not inherited or transferred. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans // 18:11, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Is this crime victim sufficiently notable? I don't think so. (I do admit that there is a certain amount of irony in that part of the criticism of the media from her case was that she was not given enough coverage, but I do think that notability is lacking, unless we're going to start making all murder victims notable.) Delete. --
Nlu (
talk) 05:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)reply
perhaps merge to
Murder of Laci Peterson There are a lot of book hits on this one, and they invariably pair the two cases. Outright deletion doesn't seem to be the right solution to this, but I agree that an independent article is hard to justify.
Mangoe (
talk) 11:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:NOTNEWS and what should be a policy
WP:NOTTRUECRIME. Bad things happen. Newspapers cover the stories. It does not follow that this is sufficient for encyclopedic biography. My condolences to the victim's family and friends.
Carrite (
talk) 01:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)reply
weak keep - per connection willing or unwillingly to the Peterson case. should pass GNG.--
BabbaQ (
talk) 19:38, 5 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete The case was only lightly reported at the time. While there are parallels to the later Peterson case, they are not sufficiently noted in Reliable Sources (a letter from a retired politician is not a Reliable Source). Ironically, one of the arguments in favor of keeping this article (in other words, an argument for notability of the crime) is that this case did NOT receive the publicity that the Peterson case did.
[1] --
MelanieN (
talk) 00:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Although the murder in itself is not notable, it is highly relevant to the Peterson case, as well as a prominent example of
Missing white girl syndrome. People reading up on the former two would be very out of luck to not be able to read about this case. Also,
it made national news -
Cake~
talk 16:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.