The result was speedy delete. following the request of the single author. Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 14:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC) reply
I declined the speedy tag but believe the article is unencyclopedic, and the term is a neologism. Would need a fundamental rewrite, mostly because it is not about the therapy itself but about the paper on the therapy. The references are: Two passing mentions, one listing in a large bibliography, the paper itself, and a further proof that the paper exists. Not sufficiently notable as a topic. Pgallert ( talk) 13:44, 17 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Request As the author of this page, I am requesting that it be immedately deleted as I am unable to rectify the problems listed above. Prsaucer1958 ( talk) 09:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. following the request of the single author. Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 14:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC) reply
I declined the speedy tag but believe the article is unencyclopedic, and the term is a neologism. Would need a fundamental rewrite, mostly because it is not about the therapy itself but about the paper on the therapy. The references are: Two passing mentions, one listing in a large bibliography, the paper itself, and a further proof that the paper exists. Not sufficiently notable as a topic. Pgallert ( talk) 13:44, 17 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Request As the author of this page, I am requesting that it be immedately deleted as I am unable to rectify the problems listed above. Prsaucer1958 ( talk) 09:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC) reply