From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:41, 2 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Euromotion (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived band which doesn't appear to have had any lasting coverage to suggest that it passes WP:BAND. The article is riddled with weasel words and unverified fan-like claims such as "gained a cult following" and "better than ever" - clear violation of WP:NPOV. StraussInTheHouse ( talk) 11:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, ZI Jony ( talk) 16:25, 24 June 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:41, 2 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Euromotion (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived band which doesn't appear to have had any lasting coverage to suggest that it passes WP:BAND. The article is riddled with weasel words and unverified fan-like claims such as "gained a cult following" and "better than ever" - clear violation of WP:NPOV. StraussInTheHouse ( talk) 11:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, ZI Jony ( talk) 16:25, 24 June 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook