The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable person, "notable" solely as the subject of some wild
conspiracy theories; fails per
WP:ONEEVENT as well. Sourcing is crap, and she's not even notable in the wackosphere.
Orange Mike |
Talk 22:45, 29 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect to
Death of Marilyn Monroe, as Murray is only discussed in reliable sources in the context of being Monroe's housekeeper in stories about Monroe's death.
[1][2][3]Everymorning(talk) 23:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete, then redirect to
Death of Marilyn Monroe. All material worthy of merging is already in the article and there is no reason to save history of fringe material credited to fringe sources. -
Location (
talk) 23:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Sourcing is hardly crap. Review the references, please. Every important point has one. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
64.183.42.50 (
talk) 23:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)reply
reply - sorry if I was unclear. The sourcing is not to
reliable sources. A well-formatted citation to a conspiracy-theory blog still does not meet
WP:RS, instead serving as a warning of
fringe content. --
Orange Mike |
Talk 15:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete She was a non-notable person. The article is packed full of speculation, and is a coatrack for conspiracy theories, not a biography of a notable person.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 05:36, 30 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Subject does not meet Wikipedia guidelines for notability.
Edward321 (
talk) 14:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete, with a possible redirect. Not shown to be notable enough for a stand alone article.
WegianWarrior (
talk) 17:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete As far as I can tell, Murray's only claim to notability is that 'she knew something which she didn't tell anyone.' Go directly to delete, do not redirect, do not collect tin-foil hat.
Rgr09 (
talk) 13:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete The references lack a whole lot of quality.
New Media Theorist (
talk) 05:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable person, "notable" solely as the subject of some wild
conspiracy theories; fails per
WP:ONEEVENT as well. Sourcing is crap, and she's not even notable in the wackosphere.
Orange Mike |
Talk 22:45, 29 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect to
Death of Marilyn Monroe, as Murray is only discussed in reliable sources in the context of being Monroe's housekeeper in stories about Monroe's death.
[1][2][3]Everymorning(talk) 23:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete, then redirect to
Death of Marilyn Monroe. All material worthy of merging is already in the article and there is no reason to save history of fringe material credited to fringe sources. -
Location (
talk) 23:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Sourcing is hardly crap. Review the references, please. Every important point has one. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
64.183.42.50 (
talk) 23:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)reply
reply - sorry if I was unclear. The sourcing is not to
reliable sources. A well-formatted citation to a conspiracy-theory blog still does not meet
WP:RS, instead serving as a warning of
fringe content. --
Orange Mike |
Talk 15:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete She was a non-notable person. The article is packed full of speculation, and is a coatrack for conspiracy theories, not a biography of a notable person.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 05:36, 30 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Subject does not meet Wikipedia guidelines for notability.
Edward321 (
talk) 14:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete, with a possible redirect. Not shown to be notable enough for a stand alone article.
WegianWarrior (
talk) 17:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete As far as I can tell, Murray's only claim to notability is that 'she knew something which she didn't tell anyone.' Go directly to delete, do not redirect, do not collect tin-foil hat.
Rgr09 (
talk) 13:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete The references lack a whole lot of quality.
New Media Theorist (
talk) 05:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.