- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to House of Ham. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Eudes I, Lord of Ham
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Eudes I, Lord of Ham ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entirely genealogical account of just another obscure minor medieval landholder, based on a single 17th century source written 600 years after the fact but prior to the development of modern scholarship, and hence non-WP:RS. The entire content, other than the name itself, is problematic, apparently muddling multiple men of the same name (compare to House of Ham, where the father of the same children attributed in this article is placed a half-century later, dating impossible with the parentage given him in this article). Should be Redirected to House of Ham without merge. Agricolae ( talk) 19:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: France, History and Royalty and nobility. Agricolae ( talk) 19:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to House of Ham, since this is just geneological table filler. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to House of Ham. There is essentially no biographic (as opposed to mere genealogical) content. The target article has a lot of redlinks which need to be delinked to discourage the creation of more articles on NN nobles. Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to House of Ham. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Eudes I, Lord of Ham
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Eudes I, Lord of Ham ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entirely genealogical account of just another obscure minor medieval landholder, based on a single 17th century source written 600 years after the fact but prior to the development of modern scholarship, and hence non-WP:RS. The entire content, other than the name itself, is problematic, apparently muddling multiple men of the same name (compare to House of Ham, where the father of the same children attributed in this article is placed a half-century later, dating impossible with the parentage given him in this article). Should be Redirected to House of Ham without merge. Agricolae ( talk) 19:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: France, History and Royalty and nobility. Agricolae ( talk) 19:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to House of Ham, since this is just geneological table filler. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to House of Ham. There is essentially no biographic (as opposed to mere genealogical) content. The target article has a lot of redlinks which need to be delinked to discourage the creation of more articles on NN nobles. Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.