- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Es Downey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think every person who ever appeared in any professional sports match is, by that fact alone, notable. There's nothing to distinguish this one. I'm not marking it for speedy deletion because the guideline specifically for Australian football is pretty low. Djcheburashka ( talk) 03:00, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete, does not pass
WP:NOT.
Shashanksinghvi334 (
talk)
03:24, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as per the long and well established consensus that playing in the highest level of a sport is notable. WT:NSPORTS is the place to argue against it if you don't like it. And if you don't pass NOT (any particular part of NOT, or just the vibe of it?), then is that a double negative meaning it IS suitable for inclusion? The-Pope ( talk) 04:03, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- I'm commenting here to repeat that there is no such consensus regarding WT:NSPORTS and notability. In fact, the pages specifically say that no consensus has been reached. They also say that the criteria that someone played in an Australian football game does not mean that the page must be kept as notable. Djcheburashka ( talk) 02:08, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes the notability guidelines for Aussie Rules footballers set out at WP:NAFL. Since he played in the 40's there's unlikely to be a plethora of online sources, but there is a reference given that lends credence. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 04:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 04:34, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 04:34, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:NAFL. The guideline for Australian rules football is no lower than the other codes of football. Subject played at the highest level. Jevansen ( talk) 05:28, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NAFL (1). Dea db eef 05:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:NAFL. Perry Middlemiss ( talk) 00:29, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:NAFL. Mellowed Fillmore ( talk) 03:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Es Downey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think every person who ever appeared in any professional sports match is, by that fact alone, notable. There's nothing to distinguish this one. I'm not marking it for speedy deletion because the guideline specifically for Australian football is pretty low. Djcheburashka ( talk) 03:00, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete, does not pass
WP:NOT.
Shashanksinghvi334 (
talk)
03:24, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as per the long and well established consensus that playing in the highest level of a sport is notable. WT:NSPORTS is the place to argue against it if you don't like it. And if you don't pass NOT (any particular part of NOT, or just the vibe of it?), then is that a double negative meaning it IS suitable for inclusion? The-Pope ( talk) 04:03, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- I'm commenting here to repeat that there is no such consensus regarding WT:NSPORTS and notability. In fact, the pages specifically say that no consensus has been reached. They also say that the criteria that someone played in an Australian football game does not mean that the page must be kept as notable. Djcheburashka ( talk) 02:08, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes the notability guidelines for Aussie Rules footballers set out at WP:NAFL. Since he played in the 40's there's unlikely to be a plethora of online sources, but there is a reference given that lends credence. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 04:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 04:34, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 04:34, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:NAFL. The guideline for Australian rules football is no lower than the other codes of football. Subject played at the highest level. Jevansen ( talk) 05:28, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NAFL (1). Dea db eef 05:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:NAFL. Perry Middlemiss ( talk) 00:29, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:NAFL. Mellowed Fillmore ( talk) 03:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.