The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep "Google" isn't the measure of notability, especially for college football coaches active in the 1950s and 1960s. Head coaches of college football programs are almost always considered notable and I see no reason to make an exception here. Logic at
WP:CFBCOACH applies. Certainly could use some "beefing up" but that's editing, not deletion.--
Paul McDonald (
talk)
16:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep Could this article use an overhaul of good info? Yes. Should we delete it? Absolutely not. He is notable in being a college coach (Even if the article has not much info) and keeping with what Jweiss11 said, there is coverage on the internet of him. (Feels like this could end in a landslide keep.)
James-the-Charizard (
talk)
00:04, 21 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per Jweiss11.
WP:TROUT to the nominator for a total lack of
WP:BEFORE, and for thinking that "the google test" was in any way sufficient for a subject that was born in 1921, died in 1985, and last active in their field in 1962.
Ejgreen77 (
talk)
14:00, 23 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep "Google" isn't the measure of notability, especially for college football coaches active in the 1950s and 1960s. Head coaches of college football programs are almost always considered notable and I see no reason to make an exception here. Logic at
WP:CFBCOACH applies. Certainly could use some "beefing up" but that's editing, not deletion.--
Paul McDonald (
talk)
16:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep Could this article use an overhaul of good info? Yes. Should we delete it? Absolutely not. He is notable in being a college coach (Even if the article has not much info) and keeping with what Jweiss11 said, there is coverage on the internet of him. (Feels like this could end in a landslide keep.)
James-the-Charizard (
talk)
00:04, 21 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per Jweiss11.
WP:TROUT to the nominator for a total lack of
WP:BEFORE, and for thinking that "the google test" was in any way sufficient for a subject that was born in 1921, died in 1985, and last active in their field in 1962.
Ejgreen77 (
talk)
14:00, 23 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.