- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There was an easy solution: the article made no viable claim of importance, nor were references provided that could support such a claim. Drmies ( talk) 21:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Enrico Thanhoffer
- Enrico Thanhoffer ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Re-nominating after discovering that the article was created by a repeat spammer, who may have been paid to create the article and/or news stories about the subject. Fails WP:N and WP:CREATIVE. There are no sources that discuss Thanhoffer in a reliable manner in anything more than just a mere mention of him. Inks.LWC ( talk) 18:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 18:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 18:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 18:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 18:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There was an easy solution: the article made no viable claim of importance, nor were references provided that could support such a claim. Drmies ( talk) 21:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Enrico Thanhoffer
- Enrico Thanhoffer ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Re-nominating after discovering that the article was created by a repeat spammer, who may have been paid to create the article and/or news stories about the subject. Fails WP:N and WP:CREATIVE. There are no sources that discuss Thanhoffer in a reliable manner in anything more than just a mere mention of him. Inks.LWC ( talk) 18:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 18:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 18:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 18:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC ( talk) 18:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.