The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{( speak to me)} 09:15, 13 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Emmanuel Ray (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP of a person with doubtful notability (the 66k+ Google hits boil down to just 107 unique links) The Banner  talk 14:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 ( talk) 15:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 ( talk) 15:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 ( talk) 15:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 ( talk) 15:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• I found some sources. Not unsourced any more. (Banner, I just discovered it's more fun to try to save AfDs. :-) -- Why should I have a User Name? ( talk) 15:47, 19 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • My main hunting ground is articles/templates with links to disambiguation pages and trying to solve them. The Banner  talk 21:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC) reply
    • Ow! You sound like Hannibal! :-) Cheers. -- Why should I have a User Name? ( talk) 21:49, 19 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep - I added several more sources. The guy is a social media PR machine, but behind all that he's managed to get a lot of interviews both by him and about him in a lot of other media. Clearly meets WP:GNG. Trackinfo ( talk) 08:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Snow keep: No longer unreferenced. "Deletion is not cleanup". Reminder, again, to nominator to carry out WP:BEFORE. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:11, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Why don't you start reading the nomination? I also doubt if he is notable enough. The Banner  talk 09:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• A "procedural note" from the old admin. Andy Mabbett, nominator is correct. This is not a BLP PROD, and please be nice. Why should I have a User Name?, I appreciate the work, but I don't see much in the way of reliable sources in there. One could go through one at a time, but really, it's blogs and zines and PR releases. Finally, the "Ray has raised funds..." paragraph, and the following one, is pure BLP fluff. Sorry to call it like I see it, but that's how I see it. If anyone can prove that these awards are in any way notable, then it's a different story. Drmies ( talk) 22:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:36, 28 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep as WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic ( talk) 05:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.