- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 20:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Emília Araújo
- Emília Araújo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG, WP:ONEEVENT. No reliable sources conform WP:RS as needed for s WP:BLP The Banner talk 07:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Cut-and-paste moved from Emilia Araújo. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- I suggest to close a discussion about that one - at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilia Araújo - and use only this to keep things in one place, given it is de facto the same article. - Nabla ( talk) 19:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilia Araújo. Fails GNG. References cited are low quality. Independent searches for sources got nothing reliable. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 20:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Emília Araújo
- Emília Araújo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG, WP:ONEEVENT. No reliable sources conform WP:RS as needed for s WP:BLP The Banner talk 07:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Cut-and-paste moved from Emilia Araújo. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- I suggest to close a discussion about that one - at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilia Araújo - and use only this to keep things in one place, given it is de facto the same article. - Nabla ( talk) 19:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 08:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilia Araújo. Fails GNG. References cited are low quality. Independent searches for sources got nothing reliable. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 20:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.