The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Appears to be the subject's CV. None of the article's "references" are independent. Fails
WP:PROF/
WP:GNG as there are no apparent reliable sources (at least, not online) that establish the subject's notability in general or as an academic.
Brycehughes (
talk) 03:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete The listing of which gallery represents her just makes this way too promotional.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 04:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep She clearly passes
WP:CREATIVE by exhibiting in known museums and major galleries in Israel. The article definitely is copy paste of here CV and need significant rework and improvement, but no doubt she is notable. I am trying to remove CV look and promotional tone at least
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 09:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete In order to meet
WP:CREATIVE they need to either have a permanent exhibit or be a major part of the temporary display at a main stream museum. Since the article gives no indication that either is true, I do not believe they meet the minimum requirements. - GalatzTalk 14:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
And she exhibited in mainstream museums, which is indicated in the article: Haifa Museum of Art, Janco Dada Museum in Ein Hod, The Artist House in Tel Aviv, Eretz Israel Museum, Ashdod Museum of Art. So, why delete?
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 14:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The only part of
WP:CREATIVE that I feel is applicable is #4 which states The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. (a) I see no significant monument, (b) which of those exhibits were significant they a substantial part of? I see no mention of that in the article, (c) I see no RS showing significant critical attention, (d) what are the permanent collections within a notable gallery or museum? Being as none of this has been clearly stated in the article I have no reason to believe any of it is true. - GalatzTalk 15:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
This part says either - it does not require all of them to be satisfied. And you don't see this part in list of group and solo exhibitions? It's clearly there. Museums where she was part of group exhibitions and the solo exhibitions in the Open Museum. Also, I just noticed the The Ann and Ari Rosenblatt Prize for Visual Art, she received in 2016 makes her pass 4c as well as 4b
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 15:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
One more thing I've found is that her works are part of permanent collection of Janco Dada Museum in Ein Hod and Open Museum.
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 08:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
And one more - 2012 Ministry of Israeli Culture and Sports prize is the second most prestigious cultural award in Israel after Prize Israel.
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 08:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Onel5969TT me 20:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 23:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)reply
It is not true that
WP:ARTIST requires that they need to either have a permanent exhibit. That would be an extraordinary hurdle to overcome. As far as I'm concerned, 4b, 4c and 4d are met. Keep.
Mduvekot (
talk) 01:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
MelanieN (
talk) 01:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Appears to be the subject's CV. None of the article's "references" are independent. Fails
WP:PROF/
WP:GNG as there are no apparent reliable sources (at least, not online) that establish the subject's notability in general or as an academic.
Brycehughes (
talk) 03:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete The listing of which gallery represents her just makes this way too promotional.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 04:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep She clearly passes
WP:CREATIVE by exhibiting in known museums and major galleries in Israel. The article definitely is copy paste of here CV and need significant rework and improvement, but no doubt she is notable. I am trying to remove CV look and promotional tone at least
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 09:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete In order to meet
WP:CREATIVE they need to either have a permanent exhibit or be a major part of the temporary display at a main stream museum. Since the article gives no indication that either is true, I do not believe they meet the minimum requirements. - GalatzTalk 14:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
And she exhibited in mainstream museums, which is indicated in the article: Haifa Museum of Art, Janco Dada Museum in Ein Hod, The Artist House in Tel Aviv, Eretz Israel Museum, Ashdod Museum of Art. So, why delete?
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 14:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The only part of
WP:CREATIVE that I feel is applicable is #4 which states The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. (a) I see no significant monument, (b) which of those exhibits were significant they a substantial part of? I see no mention of that in the article, (c) I see no RS showing significant critical attention, (d) what are the permanent collections within a notable gallery or museum? Being as none of this has been clearly stated in the article I have no reason to believe any of it is true. - GalatzTalk 15:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
This part says either - it does not require all of them to be satisfied. And you don't see this part in list of group and solo exhibitions? It's clearly there. Museums where she was part of group exhibitions and the solo exhibitions in the Open Museum. Also, I just noticed the The Ann and Ari Rosenblatt Prize for Visual Art, she received in 2016 makes her pass 4c as well as 4b
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 15:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)reply
One more thing I've found is that her works are part of permanent collection of Janco Dada Museum in Ein Hod and Open Museum.
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 08:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
And one more - 2012 Ministry of Israeli Culture and Sports prize is the second most prestigious cultural award in Israel after Prize Israel.
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 08:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Onel5969TT me 20:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 23:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)reply
It is not true that
WP:ARTIST requires that they need to either have a permanent exhibit. That would be an extraordinary hurdle to overcome. As far as I'm concerned, 4b, 4c and 4d are met. Keep.
Mduvekot (
talk) 01:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.