The result was delete. The article can be restored if an editor comes forward with an argument that the subject meets the GNG. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 02:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I don't think the subject meets WP: N. The current sources do not establish notability. They either contain substantial content from the subject herself or don't contain substantial coverage. Here is an archived version of the leading scientists link that's currently broken in the article. I couldn't find any source other than this one that could possibly be used. However, I couldn't find credentials of the journalist that wrote this, and the article mostly contains quotations from the subject anyway. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 23:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
In addition, they must have made an outstanding contribution to the advancement of the chemical sciences; or to the advancement of the chemical sciences as a profession; or have been distinguished in the management of a chemical sciences organization.I'd be inclined to argue it definitely meets WP:NPROF if it only had the first of those three criteria, but I'm not so sure about the other two. -- asilvering ( talk) 21:35, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
The FAQs also suggest that "contribution to the chemical sciences" can just mean "measurable impact on one's organization/business directions and success". JoelleJay ( talk) 21:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)✓ Five years’ professional experience or evidence of contribution to the chemical sciences (If you don't have your CV to hand, you can use our template).
✓ Two referees
✓ If applying online: A credit or debit card
✓ A £100 non-refundable application fee must accompany all applications for Fellow
The result was delete. The article can be restored if an editor comes forward with an argument that the subject meets the GNG. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 02:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I don't think the subject meets WP: N. The current sources do not establish notability. They either contain substantial content from the subject herself or don't contain substantial coverage. Here is an archived version of the leading scientists link that's currently broken in the article. I couldn't find any source other than this one that could possibly be used. However, I couldn't find credentials of the journalist that wrote this, and the article mostly contains quotations from the subject anyway. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 23:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
In addition, they must have made an outstanding contribution to the advancement of the chemical sciences; or to the advancement of the chemical sciences as a profession; or have been distinguished in the management of a chemical sciences organization.I'd be inclined to argue it definitely meets WP:NPROF if it only had the first of those three criteria, but I'm not so sure about the other two. -- asilvering ( talk) 21:35, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
The FAQs also suggest that "contribution to the chemical sciences" can just mean "measurable impact on one's organization/business directions and success". JoelleJay ( talk) 21:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)✓ Five years’ professional experience or evidence of contribution to the chemical sciences (If you don't have your CV to hand, you can use our template).
✓ Two referees
✓ If applying online: A credit or debit card
✓ A £100 non-refundable application fee must accompany all applications for Fellow