The result was Speedy Keep per point 2. this comment and this comment suggest that the nominations are to disrupt process, as a way to "get back" at wikipedia for recent MMA nominations and deletions. Note to WP:PW, simply being a PPV does not automatically qualify an event as notable, this discussion may come back up in the future. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 05:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC) ( non-admin closure) reply
This article is not notable enough for wikipedia. Glock17gen4 ( talk) 02:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep this article. This article, along with every other WWE pay-per-view, is highly notable. InFlamester20 ( talk) 05:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Keep per point 2. this comment and this comment suggest that the nominations are to disrupt process, as a way to "get back" at wikipedia for recent MMA nominations and deletions. Note to WP:PW, simply being a PPV does not automatically qualify an event as notable, this discussion may come back up in the future. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 05:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC) ( non-admin closure) reply
This article is not notable enough for wikipedia. Glock17gen4 ( talk) 02:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep this article. This article, along with every other WWE pay-per-view, is highly notable. InFlamester20 ( talk) 05:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC) reply