|
No the company's legal name is World Wrestling Entertainment check there website,DVD's they only simplified their name to WWE.IF you check WWE's greatest rivalries Bret vs Shawn JR says World Wrestling Entertainment 3 times plus CM Punk has been saying it on raw after the name change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acer723 ( talk • contribs) 05:40, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs (2011), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page The Big Show ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey man, he really did just pass away. I would hate to upset a fellow professional wrestling fan, but he died about three hours ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.22.125.67 ( talk) 03:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- TNT,#TBS, #WCW on Twitter were my sources.
The dates were added because the references that are their are wrong. They point to sites that do not have their facts correct, and they do not have any verification to them except what the internet people keep passing around cause they are to lazy to do real research to verify what they copy and paste constantly.
I will give you a quick example so you can understand. Take the example of bad information on that page. Look at the titles Graham held. Look closely at the Brass Knuckles title and follow the refernce for it, to the east texas brass knucks title page. It is so so wrong. Graham did NOT have that title in 1978. Yet you will allow that information to stay. They have no verification to prove the 1978 title run. Yet I have all the proof/verification available to prove the correct dates. That page that is used for references is horrible. they show Graham winning the title twice in 1975. (copied from my research) they show a title win in 1978 and in 1980. He did NOT have it in 1978
You also removed a reference to his debut match that had all the needed verification. The wrong year was even listed for his debut. Wiki is for fact. Wiki is to point to sites that have fact and have reliable references. Not point to sites that have misinformation. Did you even click any link to see the verification, to compare it to the misinformation that is on the other sites? Have you ever talked with Wayne Coleman to verify these bad references? Well I have. I have reserached his career. I have corresponded with him. And my research is used in his book cause my stuff is accurate.
Looks like you intervened in some earlier nonsense on the Vader page. I reverted back to your previous edit, but presumably he'll come back for it again. You'd probably see it sooner or later...but since it looks like you're policing this, thought I'd give a heads up anyway. 71.173.163.252 ( talk) 04:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.2.110 ( talk) 18:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for that, hadn't spotted the typo. I will get on to cleaning them up now. Waacstats ( talk) 19:36, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
You made a few errors in your recent edit here. Backlund was an amateur wrestler. Once you turn pro, you can't go back. "The WWF" is proper, Englishwise, and is also far more common than just "WWF". Finally, Backlund never weighed 530 pounds. You changed kilograms. Do you want to fix that, or should I revert it? I can't just touch the lead or infobox without freezing. InedibleHulk ( talk) 08:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and reverted, but redeleted the list of everyone. Changing "records" to "record" and Wikilinking "All-American" are beyond my browser's capabilities, but were good edits by you. You may want to redo them. Sorry for the annoyance. InedibleHulk ( talk) 17:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — foxj 08:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:WCWfallbrawl1997poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
What I wrote, on Wednesday the 21st of March 2012, 'He especially had to change to a face, since his gimmick was a policeman, and it would be a bad thing to have a bad portrayal of policemen; he had the choice of either that or changing his gimmick', makes sense. Think of Jacques Rougeau, as The Mountie, who, as of summer of 1993, teamed with Carl Ouellet, as 'The Quebecers' (where the latter's wrestling name was 'Pierre'), since you might remember the Mountie was a heel wrestler, and, on Carl Ouelett's page here, it says 'this was a reference to Jacques's previous gimmick, The Mountie, which the Royal Canadian Mounted Police had banned him from using in Canada, fearing that the heelish character of the Mountie would lead to children mistrusting legitimate law enforcers'. Ofcdeadbeat ( talk) 22:16, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Ofcdeadbeat
Thanks for uploading File:WCWslamboree1997poster.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 22:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm not pestering you, but can you please get back to me when you're online here again, and talk about the edit I made, back in 2012, to 'Big Boss Man', regarding how and why you didn't appreciate my edit? Ofcdeadbeat ( talk) 00:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)Ofcdeadbeat
- Going back and looking at that edit, it looks like I reverted your edit because your statement looks to be 'opinion' because, 1, you did not provide a source or citation backing up your edit, and 2, you said he 'had' to change to a face because it would be a bad portrayal of police officers if he didn't, however he had already been a heel for a couple years, which means during that entire time period he was portraying police officers in a 'bad light'. You said he either had to be face or change his gimmick. I would like to see your proof of that statement. In those days (and still today for the most part) Vince had total control over a characters direction. If a wrestler didn't want to play a certain gimmick, then they were usually 'future endeavored' before 'future endeavored' became a common term. InFlamester20 ( talk) 01:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, InFlamester20. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
You mean you didnt get tbe nice message I got for reverting his unsourced edits on WWE Hall Of Fame?? Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 04:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ha! not yet at least. I'm sure you jinxed me though. lol InFlamester20 ( talk) 04:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Can't let you miss all the fun of being called names like a child too lol. Check out my talk page, he says he has a source which is bs because WWE hasn't made any announcements yet. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 04:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- wow, pretty funny stuff. comes off as very 15ish in age. hopefully that's the case and he learns how to not be a newbie/whiner soon. InFlamester20 ( talk) 04:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Judging by his last message on my talk, which I pinged you in the respose I made, he still doesn't get it. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 04:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Do we really need to wait for WWE to announce inductions DDP and Rick Rude are the first people going in. I noticed people also tried to add them in the to be inducted in 2017 but it was reverted. Many news reports broke the news. 47.202.17.249 ( talk) 17:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- It doesn't have to be WWE, but we try to use reliable sources such as The Wrestling Observer, or even ESPN. All sources that I noticed being used have been deemed 'unreliable' per Wikiproject Professional Wrestling reliable sources InFlamester20 ( talk) 14:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
ANI Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 01:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi InFlamester20. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | Talk 13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you, much appreciated. InFlamester20 ( talk) 14:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, InFlamester20. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, InFlamester20. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi InFlamester20,
Do you still have access to The Wrestler? I've been working on your WikiProject's requested article list and hoped you might be able to fill in the missing entries for the magazine's "Introducing..." column - particularly the March 1997 and October 1997 issues. Thanks. 173.162.220.17 ( talk) 20:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for the VERY late reply! I should indeed have those issues handy. I've actually got some sort of small free time over the next week (which is what finally brought me back here). Thanks for reaching out! InFlamester20 Talk 02:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- looks like you've found what you were looking for. I apologize again for missing your original message. InFlamester20 Talk 02:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
|
No the company's legal name is World Wrestling Entertainment check there website,DVD's they only simplified their name to WWE.IF you check WWE's greatest rivalries Bret vs Shawn JR says World Wrestling Entertainment 3 times plus CM Punk has been saying it on raw after the name change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acer723 ( talk • contribs) 05:40, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs (2011), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page The Big Show ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey man, he really did just pass away. I would hate to upset a fellow professional wrestling fan, but he died about three hours ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.22.125.67 ( talk) 03:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- TNT,#TBS, #WCW on Twitter were my sources.
The dates were added because the references that are their are wrong. They point to sites that do not have their facts correct, and they do not have any verification to them except what the internet people keep passing around cause they are to lazy to do real research to verify what they copy and paste constantly.
I will give you a quick example so you can understand. Take the example of bad information on that page. Look at the titles Graham held. Look closely at the Brass Knuckles title and follow the refernce for it, to the east texas brass knucks title page. It is so so wrong. Graham did NOT have that title in 1978. Yet you will allow that information to stay. They have no verification to prove the 1978 title run. Yet I have all the proof/verification available to prove the correct dates. That page that is used for references is horrible. they show Graham winning the title twice in 1975. (copied from my research) they show a title win in 1978 and in 1980. He did NOT have it in 1978
You also removed a reference to his debut match that had all the needed verification. The wrong year was even listed for his debut. Wiki is for fact. Wiki is to point to sites that have fact and have reliable references. Not point to sites that have misinformation. Did you even click any link to see the verification, to compare it to the misinformation that is on the other sites? Have you ever talked with Wayne Coleman to verify these bad references? Well I have. I have reserached his career. I have corresponded with him. And my research is used in his book cause my stuff is accurate.
Looks like you intervened in some earlier nonsense on the Vader page. I reverted back to your previous edit, but presumably he'll come back for it again. You'd probably see it sooner or later...but since it looks like you're policing this, thought I'd give a heads up anyway. 71.173.163.252 ( talk) 04:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.2.110 ( talk) 18:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for that, hadn't spotted the typo. I will get on to cleaning them up now. Waacstats ( talk) 19:36, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
You made a few errors in your recent edit here. Backlund was an amateur wrestler. Once you turn pro, you can't go back. "The WWF" is proper, Englishwise, and is also far more common than just "WWF". Finally, Backlund never weighed 530 pounds. You changed kilograms. Do you want to fix that, or should I revert it? I can't just touch the lead or infobox without freezing. InedibleHulk ( talk) 08:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and reverted, but redeleted the list of everyone. Changing "records" to "record" and Wikilinking "All-American" are beyond my browser's capabilities, but were good edits by you. You may want to redo them. Sorry for the annoyance. InedibleHulk ( talk) 17:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — foxj 08:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:WCWfallbrawl1997poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
What I wrote, on Wednesday the 21st of March 2012, 'He especially had to change to a face, since his gimmick was a policeman, and it would be a bad thing to have a bad portrayal of policemen; he had the choice of either that or changing his gimmick', makes sense. Think of Jacques Rougeau, as The Mountie, who, as of summer of 1993, teamed with Carl Ouellet, as 'The Quebecers' (where the latter's wrestling name was 'Pierre'), since you might remember the Mountie was a heel wrestler, and, on Carl Ouelett's page here, it says 'this was a reference to Jacques's previous gimmick, The Mountie, which the Royal Canadian Mounted Police had banned him from using in Canada, fearing that the heelish character of the Mountie would lead to children mistrusting legitimate law enforcers'. Ofcdeadbeat ( talk) 22:16, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Ofcdeadbeat
Thanks for uploading File:WCWslamboree1997poster.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 22:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm not pestering you, but can you please get back to me when you're online here again, and talk about the edit I made, back in 2012, to 'Big Boss Man', regarding how and why you didn't appreciate my edit? Ofcdeadbeat ( talk) 00:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)Ofcdeadbeat
- Going back and looking at that edit, it looks like I reverted your edit because your statement looks to be 'opinion' because, 1, you did not provide a source or citation backing up your edit, and 2, you said he 'had' to change to a face because it would be a bad portrayal of police officers if he didn't, however he had already been a heel for a couple years, which means during that entire time period he was portraying police officers in a 'bad light'. You said he either had to be face or change his gimmick. I would like to see your proof of that statement. In those days (and still today for the most part) Vince had total control over a characters direction. If a wrestler didn't want to play a certain gimmick, then they were usually 'future endeavored' before 'future endeavored' became a common term. InFlamester20 ( talk) 01:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, InFlamester20. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
You mean you didnt get tbe nice message I got for reverting his unsourced edits on WWE Hall Of Fame?? Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 04:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ha! not yet at least. I'm sure you jinxed me though. lol InFlamester20 ( talk) 04:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Can't let you miss all the fun of being called names like a child too lol. Check out my talk page, he says he has a source which is bs because WWE hasn't made any announcements yet. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 04:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- wow, pretty funny stuff. comes off as very 15ish in age. hopefully that's the case and he learns how to not be a newbie/whiner soon. InFlamester20 ( talk) 04:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Judging by his last message on my talk, which I pinged you in the respose I made, he still doesn't get it. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 04:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Do we really need to wait for WWE to announce inductions DDP and Rick Rude are the first people going in. I noticed people also tried to add them in the to be inducted in 2017 but it was reverted. Many news reports broke the news. 47.202.17.249 ( talk) 17:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- It doesn't have to be WWE, but we try to use reliable sources such as The Wrestling Observer, or even ESPN. All sources that I noticed being used have been deemed 'unreliable' per Wikiproject Professional Wrestling reliable sources InFlamester20 ( talk) 14:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
ANI Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 01:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi InFlamester20. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | Talk 13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you, much appreciated. InFlamester20 ( talk) 14:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, InFlamester20. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, InFlamester20. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi InFlamester20,
Do you still have access to The Wrestler? I've been working on your WikiProject's requested article list and hoped you might be able to fill in the missing entries for the magazine's "Introducing..." column - particularly the March 1997 and October 1997 issues. Thanks. 173.162.220.17 ( talk) 20:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for the VERY late reply! I should indeed have those issues handy. I've actually got some sort of small free time over the next week (which is what finally brought me back here). Thanks for reaching out! InFlamester20 Talk 02:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- looks like you've found what you were looking for. I apologize again for missing your original message. InFlamester20 Talk 02:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)