The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article is completely unsourced. No sources found DavidEfraim ( talk) 16:42, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
@ VickKiang: Did I say just a database source was enough? No. I said Cinenacional is a notable database and mentioned the entry in the definitive book on Argentine films.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:04, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Examples of coverage insufficient to fully establish notability include newspaper listings of screening times and venues, "capsule reviews", plot summaries without critical commentary, or listings in comprehensive film guides such as Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide, Time Out Film Guide, or the Internet Movie Database, I think the dictionary is a "capsule review", but if it's longer than a lengthy paragraph, IMO that's one notable ref, but could you please insert more info in article if you have access. And the database? It's probably high-profile and reliable enough (this I agree), but it's not signiicant. The ad-like WP article says that (though there isn't a citation)
Cinenacional.com is a web portal and web-based database about Argentine cinema. The site provides a vast array of information, including films, television programs, directors, actors, cinematographers, film editors, production designers, and other production professions in Argentina. It is the most comprehensive site for information about the film industry in the country, and has over 30.000 IMDb-type articles on films alone in its database, from the silent film era onwards; based on "most comprehensive site" and "over 30,000 IMDB-type articles", I consider it to be maybe reliable, but it's not significant enough, as it only lists basic info on release and actors for almost all films (like IMDB), so I still stand by my vote of deleting. Many thanks for your help and advice! VickKiang ( talk) 08:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reconsider, the article is now sourced so deletion rationale as stated is no longer true.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Liz Sorry but the consensus is clearly keep on this. No idea why you relisted it again.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:57, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article is completely unsourced. No sources found DavidEfraim ( talk) 16:42, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
@ VickKiang: Did I say just a database source was enough? No. I said Cinenacional is a notable database and mentioned the entry in the definitive book on Argentine films.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:04, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Examples of coverage insufficient to fully establish notability include newspaper listings of screening times and venues, "capsule reviews", plot summaries without critical commentary, or listings in comprehensive film guides such as Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide, Time Out Film Guide, or the Internet Movie Database, I think the dictionary is a "capsule review", but if it's longer than a lengthy paragraph, IMO that's one notable ref, but could you please insert more info in article if you have access. And the database? It's probably high-profile and reliable enough (this I agree), but it's not signiicant. The ad-like WP article says that (though there isn't a citation)
Cinenacional.com is a web portal and web-based database about Argentine cinema. The site provides a vast array of information, including films, television programs, directors, actors, cinematographers, film editors, production designers, and other production professions in Argentina. It is the most comprehensive site for information about the film industry in the country, and has over 30.000 IMDb-type articles on films alone in its database, from the silent film era onwards; based on "most comprehensive site" and "over 30,000 IMDB-type articles", I consider it to be maybe reliable, but it's not significant enough, as it only lists basic info on release and actors for almost all films (like IMDB), so I still stand by my vote of deleting. Many thanks for your help and advice! VickKiang ( talk) 08:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reconsider, the article is now sourced so deletion rationale as stated is no longer true.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Liz Sorry but the consensus is clearly keep on this. No idea why you relisted it again.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:57, 16 July 2022 (UTC)