The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence of notability has been provided by the "Keep" commenters - "there's stuff on Google" simply isn't helpful. Reliable sources need to be identified.
Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)reply
-Comment-well the article made me think it was just some local news coverage was the thing, also sometimes it is hard finding people from India on Google you know.
Wgolf (
talk) 02:49, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
It's not that hard Wgolf... –
Davey2010 •
(talk) 20:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - I perhaps should've looked at what I linked more closely as as
Dusti pointed out they're all from one website .... Anyway not much evidence of notability beyond one minor website. –
Davey2010 •
(talk) 04:21, 23 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I can see significant coverage in reliable sources. Passes notabillity. Remember
Wgolf, Google news not totally index Indian online news sites, so don't depend on Google news when the subject is from India. JimCarter(from public cyber) 20:05, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment-yeah I know I was replying to the comment on how a simple google search works.
Wgolf (
talk) 20:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Hmm. I also wonder why
Dwaipayanc still thinks that Ekta Batra is still not notable?? This should be closed as SK #1 if Dwaipayan judge the article again. JimCarter(from public cyber) 20:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
P. S. - A normal close as "keep" will also do the work since the Afd is more than 7 days old and rough consensus has also been reached. JimCarter(from public cyber) 20:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
still delete. The Google and Google news hits merely mention her name as the host of some news programs. She is not the subject of independent articles. I don't see any significant awards either. Those gogle hits do not prove notability.--
Dwaipayan (
talk) 17:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Unfortunately I'm going to have to side with @
Dwaipayan: here. Using the news search that
Davey2010 showed, I originally thought that it was a quick "Keep", however, they're all from a single source.
This shows a more accurate view. Dusti*Let's talk!* 04:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence of notability has been provided by the "Keep" commenters - "there's stuff on Google" simply isn't helpful. Reliable sources need to be identified.
Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)reply
-Comment-well the article made me think it was just some local news coverage was the thing, also sometimes it is hard finding people from India on Google you know.
Wgolf (
talk) 02:49, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
It's not that hard Wgolf... –
Davey2010 •
(talk) 20:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - I perhaps should've looked at what I linked more closely as as
Dusti pointed out they're all from one website .... Anyway not much evidence of notability beyond one minor website. –
Davey2010 •
(talk) 04:21, 23 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I can see significant coverage in reliable sources. Passes notabillity. Remember
Wgolf, Google news not totally index Indian online news sites, so don't depend on Google news when the subject is from India. JimCarter(from public cyber) 20:05, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment-yeah I know I was replying to the comment on how a simple google search works.
Wgolf (
talk) 20:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Hmm. I also wonder why
Dwaipayanc still thinks that Ekta Batra is still not notable?? This should be closed as SK #1 if Dwaipayan judge the article again. JimCarter(from public cyber) 20:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
P. S. - A normal close as "keep" will also do the work since the Afd is more than 7 days old and rough consensus has also been reached. JimCarter(from public cyber) 20:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)reply
still delete. The Google and Google news hits merely mention her name as the host of some news programs. She is not the subject of independent articles. I don't see any significant awards either. Those gogle hits do not prove notability.--
Dwaipayan (
talk) 17:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Unfortunately I'm going to have to side with @
Dwaipayan: here. Using the news search that
Davey2010 showed, I originally thought that it was a quick "Keep", however, they're all from a single source.
This shows a more accurate view. Dusti*Let's talk!* 04:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.