The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It's not clear to me what, if anything, in this article is citable to the sources, but - I daresay this town exists, it is just possible it's notable, but "you can't get there from here" - if there is to be an article about it, you wouldn't start with that one.
Pinkbeast (
talk)
00:28, 14 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. What is citable to the sources is simply a page-quality issue, AfD is not clean-up. we have to
WP:AGF that the editor who wrote this did rely on the sources to write it unless there is some reason to believe otherwise. As such it is a sourced article. Also, per
WP:GEOLAND an inhabited location should be presumed notable so long as it actually exists, and
it clearly does.
FOARP (
talk)
09:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep per Andrew D. The key question here is is the town notable?, not is the article perfectly sourced?. Google Maps verifies that this town exists, which definitely makes it pass
WP:GEOLAND. AfD is not the place for 'is it sourced' questions, that should really go to the talk page.
Willsome429 (
say hey or
see my edits!)
16:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It's not clear to me what, if anything, in this article is citable to the sources, but - I daresay this town exists, it is just possible it's notable, but "you can't get there from here" - if there is to be an article about it, you wouldn't start with that one.
Pinkbeast (
talk)
00:28, 14 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. What is citable to the sources is simply a page-quality issue, AfD is not clean-up. we have to
WP:AGF that the editor who wrote this did rely on the sources to write it unless there is some reason to believe otherwise. As such it is a sourced article. Also, per
WP:GEOLAND an inhabited location should be presumed notable so long as it actually exists, and
it clearly does.
FOARP (
talk)
09:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep per Andrew D. The key question here is is the town notable?, not is the article perfectly sourced?. Google Maps verifies that this town exists, which definitely makes it pass
WP:GEOLAND. AfD is not the place for 'is it sourced' questions, that should really go to the talk page.
Willsome429 (
say hey or
see my edits!)
16:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.