The result was keep. No support for deletion apart from the nominator and at least one independent editor thinks the article meets the notabilty guidelines. Davewild ( talk) 09:48, 13 November 2010 (UTC) reply
DELETE Does not appear to meet
WP:GNG
WP:BIO. Subject is a Manhattan real estate attorney who gets quoted for comment by publications, but as far as I can tell after some Googling, he himself has not been the subject of in-depth coverage beyond a "who's who" type profile in the New York Observer last year, and it's telling that no other articles link here. Also, the article has been written for the most part by his firm's PR agency, and if kept, would probably need a rewrite.
Mosmof (
talk) 04:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
reply
Individual sold more real estate than anyone else @ 15 CPW, which is NY's most expensive development. That alone is legendary. Beyond that, Business Week, The Observer and countless others have featured him. Surely he's very noteable. (and the Observer wasnt a whos who it ranked top 15 real estate NY lawyers, and he was featured.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.122.113 ( talk) 05:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Strong Keep. Yes he is an attorney and developer, and 1 of the most successful in the US representing oligarchs who buy. Clearly thats a major big deal on its own. Stong keep (and Mosmof, mentioning the NY Observer article alone makes it relevant and noteable.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Babasalichai ( talk • contribs) 05:41, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Mosmof you sound like a broken record. Removing this entry has tried and failed, whats new about trying to remove it and it failed a few months ago ? yes it is your criteria nowhere does it say how many media mentions/features are needed. and I'd argue that the OBserver and Business Week are in fact features. They are. What changes do you propose to keep this live ? (make them here before you make them there). This is 1 of foremost leaders in NY Real estate he's very prominent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.122.113 ( talk) 11:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC) reply
THis has been raised before by much the same characters and should now be acceptable. Clearly newsworthy and meets news standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Babasalichai ( talk • contribs) 06:15, 9 November 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No support for deletion apart from the nominator and at least one independent editor thinks the article meets the notabilty guidelines. Davewild ( talk) 09:48, 13 November 2010 (UTC) reply
DELETE Does not appear to meet
WP:GNG
WP:BIO. Subject is a Manhattan real estate attorney who gets quoted for comment by publications, but as far as I can tell after some Googling, he himself has not been the subject of in-depth coverage beyond a "who's who" type profile in the New York Observer last year, and it's telling that no other articles link here. Also, the article has been written for the most part by his firm's PR agency, and if kept, would probably need a rewrite.
Mosmof (
talk) 04:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
reply
Individual sold more real estate than anyone else @ 15 CPW, which is NY's most expensive development. That alone is legendary. Beyond that, Business Week, The Observer and countless others have featured him. Surely he's very noteable. (and the Observer wasnt a whos who it ranked top 15 real estate NY lawyers, and he was featured.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.122.113 ( talk) 05:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Strong Keep. Yes he is an attorney and developer, and 1 of the most successful in the US representing oligarchs who buy. Clearly thats a major big deal on its own. Stong keep (and Mosmof, mentioning the NY Observer article alone makes it relevant and noteable.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Babasalichai ( talk • contribs) 05:41, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Mosmof you sound like a broken record. Removing this entry has tried and failed, whats new about trying to remove it and it failed a few months ago ? yes it is your criteria nowhere does it say how many media mentions/features are needed. and I'd argue that the OBserver and Business Week are in fact features. They are. What changes do you propose to keep this live ? (make them here before you make them there). This is 1 of foremost leaders in NY Real estate he's very prominent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.122.113 ( talk) 11:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC) reply
THis has been raised before by much the same characters and should now be acceptable. Clearly newsworthy and meets news standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Babasalichai ( talk • contribs) 06:15, 9 November 2010 (UTC) reply