From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No support for deletion. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 20:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Edward H. Milligan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sadly, I don't think this individual meets our notability criteria. There's perhaps an argument for notability under WP:AUTHOR, but I haven't been able to find significant coverage to meet WP:GNG - which is presumably why the article has to rely on non-published sources for details of the date of death. Cordless Larry ( talk) 10:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry ( talk) 10:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry ( talk) 10:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry ( talk) 10:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Published source of Date of Death information provided.User Vernon White 20-10-2020
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 09:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 09:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 09:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment @ DGG: as although his expertise is in academics, believe he also has a more general library background and can advise. Personally feel like there might be enough there, especially if we can find better sourcing on Besterman/McColvin Award. At the moment, neutral as I look further into Milligan. StarM 15:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. He was the librarian of a specialized society, which does not usually lead to notability, but he seems to have been the principal figure in the field. He furthermore has two of the automatic passes in WP:PROF--he received an honorary degree, (other than one from his own institution) , and a festschrift was written as a tribute to him. I'm not familiarwith the prize, but it might be additional. DGG ( talk ) 18:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:01, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep -- This is a case that does not quite fit with the standard criteria, either for academics or authors, but I would expect the holder of his library post to be a prime authority on the history of Quakers. I see at least 5 serious academic works among his listed publications. Furthermore, having a festschrift, normally associated with retirement is an indication that other scholars regarded the person as notable. Several of these alone would perhaps not be quite enough for WP notability. Added together, I think they should take him over that hurdle. Peterkingiron ( talk) 16:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply
As Ted Milligan died quite recently, it may be that an authoritative obituary maybe published soon. Vernon White . . . Talk
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No support for deletion. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 20:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Edward H. Milligan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sadly, I don't think this individual meets our notability criteria. There's perhaps an argument for notability under WP:AUTHOR, but I haven't been able to find significant coverage to meet WP:GNG - which is presumably why the article has to rely on non-published sources for details of the date of death. Cordless Larry ( talk) 10:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry ( talk) 10:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry ( talk) 10:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry ( talk) 10:45, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Published source of Date of Death information provided.User Vernon White 20-10-2020
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 09:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 09:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 09:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Comment @ DGG: as although his expertise is in academics, believe he also has a more general library background and can advise. Personally feel like there might be enough there, especially if we can find better sourcing on Besterman/McColvin Award. At the moment, neutral as I look further into Milligan. StarM 15:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. He was the librarian of a specialized society, which does not usually lead to notability, but he seems to have been the principal figure in the field. He furthermore has two of the automatic passes in WP:PROF--he received an honorary degree, (other than one from his own institution) , and a festschrift was written as a tribute to him. I'm not familiarwith the prize, but it might be additional. DGG ( talk ) 18:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:01, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep -- This is a case that does not quite fit with the standard criteria, either for academics or authors, but I would expect the holder of his library post to be a prime authority on the history of Quakers. I see at least 5 serious academic works among his listed publications. Furthermore, having a festschrift, normally associated with retirement is an indication that other scholars regarded the person as notable. Several of these alone would perhaps not be quite enough for WP notability. Added together, I think they should take him over that hurdle. Peterkingiron ( talk) 16:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply
As Ted Milligan died quite recently, it may be that an authoritative obituary maybe published soon. Vernon White . . . Talk
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook