The result of the debate was Keep. The Land 22:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Article contains no factual arguments, rather is literally full of selective quotes. Cited single POV arguments are based on the biased and innacurate assumption that Fascists had their own economic ideology distinct from both "capitalism" and "socialism and communism." This assumption is used like a straw man to attack the New Deal and government intervention as "fascist." Article does not address correlations between Fascist economic policies, it is simply a tool for ideological smearing. In the interest of accuracy and NPOV, Economics of Fascism needs to be deleted.-- sansvoix 20:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC) reply
*Delete - Article is based on a non-notable
Neologism (that also isn't at all coherent) (
Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms). RJII has a big history of creating POV articles to get his political messages across. In fact I consider him to be a paid
Agent provocateur (employed by U.S Gov or a right-wing 'think tank'): "BFD. Can't Wikipedia for 24 hours. Who cares! I'm still getting paid. You sure are making productive use of that petty power aren't you? RJII 17:46, 29 December 2005" <From RJII's talkpage. Another reason I suspect this is because RJII is on 8hrs a day every day since about May time (and then only to create articles like this and POVing the Anarchism article). This article was created to push the ridiculous far-right hypothesis that
National Socialism and
Socialism and the USA during the depression are essentially the same. If this article was about Capitalist economies under Fascist governance I would dive in and contribute. It is not. -
max rspct
leave a message
21:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
I withdraw my delete nomination since the
AFD nomination has attracted more editors to the article. -
max rspct
leave a message
12:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Keep, there is a lot that can be done with this article beyond just cleaning it up. (Gibby 16:53, 6 January 2006 (UTC))
The result of the debate was Keep. The Land 22:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Article contains no factual arguments, rather is literally full of selective quotes. Cited single POV arguments are based on the biased and innacurate assumption that Fascists had their own economic ideology distinct from both "capitalism" and "socialism and communism." This assumption is used like a straw man to attack the New Deal and government intervention as "fascist." Article does not address correlations between Fascist economic policies, it is simply a tool for ideological smearing. In the interest of accuracy and NPOV, Economics of Fascism needs to be deleted.-- sansvoix 20:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC) reply
*Delete - Article is based on a non-notable
Neologism (that also isn't at all coherent) (
Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms). RJII has a big history of creating POV articles to get his political messages across. In fact I consider him to be a paid
Agent provocateur (employed by U.S Gov or a right-wing 'think tank'): "BFD. Can't Wikipedia for 24 hours. Who cares! I'm still getting paid. You sure are making productive use of that petty power aren't you? RJII 17:46, 29 December 2005" <From RJII's talkpage. Another reason I suspect this is because RJII is on 8hrs a day every day since about May time (and then only to create articles like this and POVing the Anarchism article). This article was created to push the ridiculous far-right hypothesis that
National Socialism and
Socialism and the USA during the depression are essentially the same. If this article was about Capitalist economies under Fascist governance I would dive in and contribute. It is not. -
max rspct
leave a message
21:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
I withdraw my delete nomination since the
AFD nomination has attracted more editors to the article. -
max rspct
leave a message
12:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Keep, there is a lot that can be done with this article beyond just cleaning it up. (Gibby 16:53, 6 January 2006 (UTC))