- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Chris troutman and anyone else who wants to improve the article may go to it. Deor ( talk) 13:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Economic History Association
- Economic History Association ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organization, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG/ WP:ORG. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 03:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Here is an academic book that describes the origins of the group in the late 1930s and its founding. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:49, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Userfy Although Cullen328 points out a possibly independent source, this article can't stay as is. If there's consensus to delete I'd like to have this moved into my userspace so I can rehab it. Chris Troutman ( talk) 22:50, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Strong keep -- Its Journal of Economic History, Economic History Review, and Explorations in Economic History are the three most important economic hisotry jounrals. The subject of this article is the publisher of this journal and is the American equivalent of (British) Economic History Society. At worst, merge to its Journal (or vice versa). I expect there is the usual problem that applies to almost all learned societies that the main sources of information are internal ones to the association. However, newletters and reports are produced to inform members about the Association's activities and can be expected to be true, even if they are not independent. That ought to be enough for WP:V. Peterkingiron ( talk) 16:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep or merge to The Journal of Economic History per Peterkingiron. Needs cleanup, not deletion.-- JayJasper ( talk) 22:34, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Chris troutman and anyone else who wants to improve the article may go to it. Deor ( talk) 13:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Economic History Association
- Economic History Association ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organization, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG/ WP:ORG. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 03:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Here is an academic book that describes the origins of the group in the late 1930s and its founding. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:49, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Userfy Although Cullen328 points out a possibly independent source, this article can't stay as is. If there's consensus to delete I'd like to have this moved into my userspace so I can rehab it. Chris Troutman ( talk) 22:50, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Strong keep -- Its Journal of Economic History, Economic History Review, and Explorations in Economic History are the three most important economic hisotry jounrals. The subject of this article is the publisher of this journal and is the American equivalent of (British) Economic History Society. At worst, merge to its Journal (or vice versa). I expect there is the usual problem that applies to almost all learned societies that the main sources of information are internal ones to the association. However, newletters and reports are produced to inform members about the Association's activities and can be expected to be true, even if they are not independent. That ought to be enough for WP:V. Peterkingiron ( talk) 16:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep or merge to The Journal of Economic History per Peterkingiron. Needs cleanup, not deletion.-- JayJasper ( talk) 22:34, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.