The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
My apologies if I was unclear. G4 is for quickly removing articles that have previously been deleted as part of a formal deletion discussion. The link you're providing is to this page. We would need a link to a prior discussion to act upon. I don't see anything obvious in the history.
Kuru(talk)20:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)reply
no to speedy We need a full discussion on this. The reason behind the proposed speedy is unclear and circular, which may be an error or something more. So let's let the discussion run its course.--
Paul McDonald (
talk)
01:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment:WP:CSD#G4 does not apply, as it was only deleted via PROD. However, this makes the page ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit06:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
My apologies if I was unclear. G4 is for quickly removing articles that have previously been deleted as part of a formal deletion discussion. The link you're providing is to this page. We would need a link to a prior discussion to act upon. I don't see anything obvious in the history.
Kuru(talk)20:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)reply
no to speedy We need a full discussion on this. The reason behind the proposed speedy is unclear and circular, which may be an error or something more. So let's let the discussion run its course.--
Paul McDonald (
talk)
01:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment:WP:CSD#G4 does not apply, as it was only deleted via PROD. However, this makes the page ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit06:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.