- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 05:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Dykedolls
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dykedolls ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This company does not appear to meet WP:ORGCRIT as it was not ' the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.' The company seems to have lasted a few years and attracted attention mostly on collector and fan sites. The NYT reference in the article is the most solid sourcing; most of the other coverage does not look satisfactory in order to meet our notability criteria. Mccapra ( talk) 11:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 11:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 11:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 11:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment In addition, based on this twitter handle, the creator of the article appears to have been the founder and owner of the company. Mccapra ( talk) 11:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisting comment: When commenting be pithy. Be concise. Cite policies or guidelines if possible. Confine your comments to what is germane to the discussion and be brief. Above all, be brief!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - There are a few mentions of the company in reliable sources, such as the NYT article currently used in the article, but they are all very brief. None of them are the substantial coverage needed to demonstrate notability. And, as the company seems to be now defunct, it seems unlikely that there will be any further in-depth coverage of it at this point. Rorshacma ( talk) 01:01, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 20:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 12:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 05:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Dykedolls
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dykedolls ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This company does not appear to meet WP:ORGCRIT as it was not ' the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.' The company seems to have lasted a few years and attracted attention mostly on collector and fan sites. The NYT reference in the article is the most solid sourcing; most of the other coverage does not look satisfactory in order to meet our notability criteria. Mccapra ( talk) 11:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 11:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 11:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 11:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Comment In addition, based on this twitter handle, the creator of the article appears to have been the founder and owner of the company. Mccapra ( talk) 11:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisting comment: When commenting be pithy. Be concise. Cite policies or guidelines if possible. Confine your comments to what is germane to the discussion and be brief. Above all, be brief!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - There are a few mentions of the company in reliable sources, such as the NYT article currently used in the article, but they are all very brief. None of them are the substantial coverage needed to demonstrate notability. And, as the company seems to be now defunct, it seems unlikely that there will be any further in-depth coverage of it at this point. Rorshacma ( talk) 01:01, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 20:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 12:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.