From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. -- Scott ( talk) 02:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Dragons of Camelot

Dragons of Camelot (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. It exists, sure, but not notable. Not even able to find reviews that are not coming from blogs. References in the article are a primary source and a review which does not even go in depth about the movie per WP:SIGCOV. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:53, 14 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord ( talk) 02:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 06:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. -- Scott ( talk) 02:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Dragons of Camelot

Dragons of Camelot (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. It exists, sure, but not notable. Not even able to find reviews that are not coming from blogs. References in the article are a primary source and a review which does not even go in depth about the movie per WP:SIGCOV. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:53, 14 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord ( talk) 02:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 06:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook