- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 05:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Dr Sadad Al Husseini
- Dr Sadad Al Husseini ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article for not notable businessman, created by a editor related to him (taking into account the name of an editor) Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 07:58, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Sounds promotional written like an advert. FITINDIA (talk) 08:50, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note I have redirected Sadad Al Husseini to Dr Sadad Al Husseini,A duplicate page created by the same user. FITINDIA (talk) 09:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Blatant vanity. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as blatant bio-spam very obviously created by a COI/PAID user, as
Husseini energy matches
http://www.husseinienergy.com/ He may be notable, news and book sources reveal that he at least is often quoted in English language sources, but in a case like this I tend to agree with a view held by
DGG that
Any article edited by a promotional editor should always be deleted. This is the only way to discourage people from using the WP for advertising. If the subject is actually important, someone else will create an article. Rescuing it sends the message that if your write an unacceptable article about yourself, someone will very possibly fix it for you, and therefore you might as well try to advertise here. It furthermore sends the message that if you hire someone to write an article and they take money for doing this, and they write the usual unacceptable article such people write, then someone will fix it for you free, while the guy who wrote the bad article gets the money.
( diff) — Sam Sailor 19:12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 19:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 19:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 05:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Dr Sadad Al Husseini
- Dr Sadad Al Husseini ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article for not notable businessman, created by a editor related to him (taking into account the name of an editor) Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 07:58, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Sounds promotional written like an advert. FITINDIA (talk) 08:50, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note I have redirected Sadad Al Husseini to Dr Sadad Al Husseini,A duplicate page created by the same user. FITINDIA (talk) 09:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Blatant vanity. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 10:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as blatant bio-spam very obviously created by a COI/PAID user, as
Husseini energy matches
http://www.husseinienergy.com/ He may be notable, news and book sources reveal that he at least is often quoted in English language sources, but in a case like this I tend to agree with a view held by
DGG that
Any article edited by a promotional editor should always be deleted. This is the only way to discourage people from using the WP for advertising. If the subject is actually important, someone else will create an article. Rescuing it sends the message that if your write an unacceptable article about yourself, someone will very possibly fix it for you, and therefore you might as well try to advertise here. It furthermore sends the message that if you hire someone to write an article and they take money for doing this, and they write the usual unacceptable article such people write, then someone will fix it for you free, while the guy who wrote the bad article gets the money.
( diff) — Sam Sailor 19:12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 19:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 19:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.