The result was delete. Clear delete after relisting. I will protect this title also. DGG ( talk ) 22:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
I do not think that this page is way to promotional as he has really put up as what he has done . Has someone even read the references? I doubt. All the references are proving him right and look at his talk page . people are just saying that the vote is for keeping it on Wikipedia page as he is really deserved to .
Valentina11112 (
talk) 06:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC) —
Valentina 11112 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
↑Kindly consider the discussion going on talk page of Dr Ashwin Porwal as well , i do not think that this article should be taken of as it is a biography of India's First proctology Doctor and who has done so much of good in social cause .And he has even arrived on various news channels . if the page was to be promotional then why wouldn't he add various other information like about he is the first Dr to do POP surgery in india . Treated more than 30000 piles patients , and various other information . you can read the references given in the article and those references can prove my words . But this all matter isn't given in article and this shows that it isn't a promotional activity @ talk:Johnpacklambert from Franklin10hhc ( talk) 06:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC) — Franklin10hhc ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The references given are enough to prove his worthiness and to be a part of Wikipedia content , I didn't find any promotional content in this page . I give a thumbs up to this article and it should be a part on wiki Wiki111222333 ( talk) 06:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC) — Wiki111222333 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. Clear delete after relisting. I will protect this title also. DGG ( talk ) 22:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
I do not think that this page is way to promotional as he has really put up as what he has done . Has someone even read the references? I doubt. All the references are proving him right and look at his talk page . people are just saying that the vote is for keeping it on Wikipedia page as he is really deserved to .
Valentina11112 (
talk) 06:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC) —
Valentina 11112 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
↑Kindly consider the discussion going on talk page of Dr Ashwin Porwal as well , i do not think that this article should be taken of as it is a biography of India's First proctology Doctor and who has done so much of good in social cause .And he has even arrived on various news channels . if the page was to be promotional then why wouldn't he add various other information like about he is the first Dr to do POP surgery in india . Treated more than 30000 piles patients , and various other information . you can read the references given in the article and those references can prove my words . But this all matter isn't given in article and this shows that it isn't a promotional activity @ talk:Johnpacklambert from Franklin10hhc ( talk) 06:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC) — Franklin10hhc ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The references given are enough to prove his worthiness and to be a part of Wikipedia content , I didn't find any promotional content in this page . I give a thumbs up to this article and it should be a part on wiki Wiki111222333 ( talk) 06:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC) — Wiki111222333 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.