From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 12:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Dr. Steven Willey

Dr. Steven Willey (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dr. Wiley's page has one reference from a reliable source that is not selfpublished or Resume like. This one reference does not establish notability. Spent some time looking him up in search engines and did not find anything beyond what you would find for any Medical Doctor. VViking Talk Edits 17:20, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply


I am also nominating the following related pages because this article about Dr. Willey's Exertion scale produces zero hits on a google search.
Willey Exertion Scale (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) VViking Talk Edits 18:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete both. As a physician and author, the individual fails all the relevant notability guidelines at WP:BIO due to lack of coverage in secondary reliable sources independent of the subject. His scale also fails WP:GNG for the same reason. This all seems highly promotional. (Disclosure: I am responding due to a notice placed in Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard.) - Location ( talk) 22:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:02, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 12:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Dr. Steven Willey

Dr. Steven Willey (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dr. Wiley's page has one reference from a reliable source that is not selfpublished or Resume like. This one reference does not establish notability. Spent some time looking him up in search engines and did not find anything beyond what you would find for any Medical Doctor. VViking Talk Edits 17:20, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply


I am also nominating the following related pages because this article about Dr. Willey's Exertion scale produces zero hits on a google search.
Willey Exertion Scale (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) VViking Talk Edits 18:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete both. As a physician and author, the individual fails all the relevant notability guidelines at WP:BIO due to lack of coverage in secondary reliable sources independent of the subject. His scale also fails WP:GNG for the same reason. This all seems highly promotional. (Disclosure: I am responding due to a notice placed in Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard.) - Location ( talk) 22:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:02, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook