From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Dony Valle

Dony Valle (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Simione001 ( talk) 01:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 02:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Why was this relisted when consensus is clear? LibStar ( talk) 05:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
I agree, it seems a bit unusual. AssumeGoodWraith what was the reason for relisting as opposed to closing? Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Need a bit more reason than "not notable" or "fails gng". This afd can still be closed at any time if I made another error. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Are you an admin? LibStar ( talk) 04:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Fails GNG is a clear enough reason. It means there aren't enough sources about it to pass GNG. If you can't understand that, you shouldn't be doing admin/experienced editor level tasks like relisting. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Dony Valle

Dony Valle (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Simione001 ( talk) 01:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 02:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Why was this relisted when consensus is clear? LibStar ( talk) 05:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
I agree, it seems a bit unusual. AssumeGoodWraith what was the reason for relisting as opposed to closing? Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Need a bit more reason than "not notable" or "fails gng". This afd can still be closed at any time if I made another error. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 03:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Are you an admin? LibStar ( talk) 04:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Fails GNG is a clear enough reason. It means there aren't enough sources about it to pass GNG. If you can't understand that, you shouldn't be doing admin/experienced editor level tasks like relisting. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook