From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America 1000 14:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Donald Bejko

Donald Bejko (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC, the latter specifically states that database websites are not acceptable for notability purposes as they have very low standards for inclusion and do not provide significant prose coverage. Searching in multiple search engines, I could find nothing other than database websites and Wikipedia mirrors. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America 1000 14:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Donald Bejko

Donald Bejko (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC, the latter specifically states that database websites are not acceptable for notability purposes as they have very low standards for inclusion and do not provide significant prose coverage. Searching in multiple search engines, I could find nothing other than database websites and Wikipedia mirrors. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook