From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 07:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Divine Divine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable gospel group that fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. All of the sources cited in the article are either unreliable or inaccessible. A Google search of the group doesn't show coverage in reliable sources.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 13:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 13:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 13:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac 1 5 21:04, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 07:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Divine Divine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable gospel group that fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. All of the sources cited in the article are either unreliable or inaccessible. A Google search of the group doesn't show coverage in reliable sources.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 13:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 13:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 13:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac 1 5 21:04, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook