The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 02:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Refunded following soft deletion, but all problems from the last AfD persist. The article's sole reliance on pre-release PR coverage is particularly egregious considering that it aired in 2016. signed, Rosguilltalk 00:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Strong Delete per nom. The sources are obviously non-RS routine announcements failing
WP:SIGCOV.
This source has no editorial policies whatsoever, and is merely a press release praising an actress's looks.
This is a routine listing, whereas
this is another non-RS I asked at
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 389#Hip in Pakistan (though only one editor responded), though the article creator repeatedly uses its source and states it's RS in previous discussions, e.g.,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khoobsurat (TV series), because of its social media page (?). My search found trivial mentions e.g.,
this but nothing that meets
WP:GNG. VickKiang(talk) 21:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 01:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak delete I don't see anything for this TV show, I see an album release by a musician that uses this name. I would assume there is coverage of the show somewhere, but I don't see it.
Oaktree b (
talk) 01:18, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 01:27, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
It seems that Explicit relisted this earlier today at 01:08 13 December 2022.
User:Liz, I am not sure of the double relisting (I might be missing something). Thanks. VickKiang(talk) 01:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
VickKiang, I had the daily log page open and didn't refresh the page before I acted so I didn't see that the discussion had already been relisted 19 minutes earlier. LizRead!Talk! 02:52, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
No worries (not sure if I can still comment here..., please revert if needed). Thanks. VickKiang(talk) 02:57, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 02:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Refunded following soft deletion, but all problems from the last AfD persist. The article's sole reliance on pre-release PR coverage is particularly egregious considering that it aired in 2016. signed, Rosguilltalk 00:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Strong Delete per nom. The sources are obviously non-RS routine announcements failing
WP:SIGCOV.
This source has no editorial policies whatsoever, and is merely a press release praising an actress's looks.
This is a routine listing, whereas
this is another non-RS I asked at
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 389#Hip in Pakistan (though only one editor responded), though the article creator repeatedly uses its source and states it's RS in previous discussions, e.g.,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khoobsurat (TV series), because of its social media page (?). My search found trivial mentions e.g.,
this but nothing that meets
WP:GNG. VickKiang(talk) 21:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 01:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak delete I don't see anything for this TV show, I see an album release by a musician that uses this name. I would assume there is coverage of the show somewhere, but I don't see it.
Oaktree b (
talk) 01:18, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 01:27, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
It seems that Explicit relisted this earlier today at 01:08 13 December 2022.
User:Liz, I am not sure of the double relisting (I might be missing something). Thanks. VickKiang(talk) 01:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
VickKiang, I had the daily log page open and didn't refresh the page before I acted so I didn't see that the discussion had already been relisted 19 minutes earlier. LizRead!Talk! 02:52, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
No worries (not sure if I can still comment here..., please revert if needed). Thanks. VickKiang(talk) 02:57, 13 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.