The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
This didn't even pass AfC but was moved to the mainspace by the original author. In any case, this fails WP:ORGDEPTH. Sources discussing the company in detail seem to be mostly WP:SPS. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 02:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment: I would disagree that most of the sources are self published, I see a few that look to be broad coverage of events such as CES in which the company was featured, and others where people from the company are interviewed about something. One thing I would say is that few if any of the major sources are actually specifically about the company, and just mention or feature it. Tpdwkouaa ( talk) 02:41, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
commentary Jytdog ( talk) 23:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Daily Mail has a 138 world ranking on Alexis, Mashable is 376 in the world, both authors appear to staff writers. Wikipedia now allows sources like Southern Poverty Law Center and MediaMatters in BLPs, both of which are advocacy groups so I'm not worried about The Daily Mail or Mashable for non-controversial topics. We have these news articles connecting the company to the product [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] and dozens of more articles about the product alone. Per WP:PRODUCT the product belongs in an article about the company. Notability is based upon sustained coverage, but as the moving party, feel free to ask about Daily Mail and Mashable in this context at RSN. 009o9 Disclosure (Talk) 06:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
|
more commentary Jytdog ( talk) 23:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
yet more commentary Jytdog ( talk) 23:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
This didn't even pass AfC but was moved to the mainspace by the original author. In any case, this fails WP:ORGDEPTH. Sources discussing the company in detail seem to be mostly WP:SPS. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 02:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment: I would disagree that most of the sources are self published, I see a few that look to be broad coverage of events such as CES in which the company was featured, and others where people from the company are interviewed about something. One thing I would say is that few if any of the major sources are actually specifically about the company, and just mention or feature it. Tpdwkouaa ( talk) 02:41, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
commentary Jytdog ( talk) 23:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Daily Mail has a 138 world ranking on Alexis, Mashable is 376 in the world, both authors appear to staff writers. Wikipedia now allows sources like Southern Poverty Law Center and MediaMatters in BLPs, both of which are advocacy groups so I'm not worried about The Daily Mail or Mashable for non-controversial topics. We have these news articles connecting the company to the product [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] and dozens of more articles about the product alone. Per WP:PRODUCT the product belongs in an article about the company. Notability is based upon sustained coverage, but as the moving party, feel free to ask about Daily Mail and Mashable in this context at RSN. 009o9 Disclosure (Talk) 06:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
|
more commentary Jytdog ( talk) 23:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
yet more commentary Jytdog ( talk) 23:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|