From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Smegma. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Dick cheese (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't really know what formal rationale to use here. Originally created as this [1] in 2004 and promptly created into a redirect to smegma. Changed to a disambiguation page in 2006 for Richard Cheese (who I now know is a cover band and comedy act making a pun). Since then it seems to have only been the target of vandalism and not much more. Can't really see how having it adds value to the encyclopedia. TonyBallioni ( talk) 00:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 00:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or Redirect with full protection: Appears to be a vandal target. Perhaps salt it too. Montanabw (talk) 08:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Salt seems like a good idea here, I agree. TonyBallioni ( talk) 13:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Smegma. More than 20 views a day, [2], often quite a lot more, indicating readers are typing it in and we should help them find what they are looking for. Boleyn ( talk) 10:14, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
You do have a point. Modifying my !vote - definitely want to prevent it being edited, so full protection is really a must. Montanabw (talk) 03:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect per Boleyn. Maybe the redirect would benefit from full protection once done? Mjroots ( talk) 19:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Smegma. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Dick cheese (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't really know what formal rationale to use here. Originally created as this [1] in 2004 and promptly created into a redirect to smegma. Changed to a disambiguation page in 2006 for Richard Cheese (who I now know is a cover band and comedy act making a pun). Since then it seems to have only been the target of vandalism and not much more. Can't really see how having it adds value to the encyclopedia. TonyBallioni ( talk) 00:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 00:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete or Redirect with full protection: Appears to be a vandal target. Perhaps salt it too. Montanabw (talk) 08:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Salt seems like a good idea here, I agree. TonyBallioni ( talk) 13:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Smegma. More than 20 views a day, [2], often quite a lot more, indicating readers are typing it in and we should help them find what they are looking for. Boleyn ( talk) 10:14, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
You do have a point. Modifying my !vote - definitely want to prevent it being edited, so full protection is really a must. Montanabw (talk) 03:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect per Boleyn. Maybe the redirect would benefit from full protection once done? Mjroots ( talk) 19:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook