The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:38, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Borderline, but I don't think it passes WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Its articles in other languages and its Google search failed to show the significance or coverage we look for. This has been in CAT:NN's backlog for 12 years - I hope we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:38, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Borderline, but I don't think it passes WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Its articles in other languages and its Google search failed to show the significance or coverage we look for. This has been in CAT:NN's backlog for 12 years - I hope we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)