The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article about former footballer which comprehensively fails
WP:GNG. Towards the end of his footballing career, Ortiz was the subject of an article covering his hairdressing business (
[1]). This single article isn't enough to satisfy the GNG, and the only other online English and Spanish-language coverage is routine/trivial.
Jogurney (
talk)
14:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep I think the article establishes noteability, and he had a not-short career in Paraguay with plenty of secondary coverage, mentioned probably a hundred plus times
here for example.--
Ortizesp (
talk)
14:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per Ortizesp and recent expansion. There are sources like
[2] among many many other sources. Played 50+ games in fully pro Paraguay and Chile top flights in a fully pro career lasting over 10 years. In addition, having played in 2000s and early 2010s, there is deifneitly offline coverage. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks,
Das osmnezz (
talk)
16:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Sorry, but we need more than assertions of other sources, and vague waves at search results and imaginary offline coverage. This is a player from the internet age, so if sources exist anywhere, there will be some online. I'm not seeing evidence that significant coverage exists, beyond one human interest piece about a footballers diversion into hairdressing – unfortunately, given the nature of this article, this cannot be used as an indicator that more sources exist. wjematherplease leave a message...16:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. The only good piece of significant coverage I can see is the one identified and acknowledged by the nominator. Got some sources that demonstrate notability? Happy to take a look and reconsider if so.
MarchOfTheGreyhounds (
talk)
09:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
I think it's an automated reading of the entire page (as it originally existed) with headlines, weather, etc. Once you get to about the last minute, the article is read (nothing new at all compared to the text).
Jogurney (
talk)
16:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. If the only reason we have an article on someone in the first place is because they played a sport professionally, but the only nontrivial coverage of them is in a completely different mundane context and doesn't meet GNG, then further GNG-meeting coverage of the subject should not be presumed.
JoelleJay (
talk)
01:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article about former footballer which comprehensively fails
WP:GNG. Towards the end of his footballing career, Ortiz was the subject of an article covering his hairdressing business (
[1]). This single article isn't enough to satisfy the GNG, and the only other online English and Spanish-language coverage is routine/trivial.
Jogurney (
talk)
14:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep I think the article establishes noteability, and he had a not-short career in Paraguay with plenty of secondary coverage, mentioned probably a hundred plus times
here for example.--
Ortizesp (
talk)
14:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per Ortizesp and recent expansion. There are sources like
[2] among many many other sources. Played 50+ games in fully pro Paraguay and Chile top flights in a fully pro career lasting over 10 years. In addition, having played in 2000s and early 2010s, there is deifneitly offline coverage. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks,
Das osmnezz (
talk)
16:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Sorry, but we need more than assertions of other sources, and vague waves at search results and imaginary offline coverage. This is a player from the internet age, so if sources exist anywhere, there will be some online. I'm not seeing evidence that significant coverage exists, beyond one human interest piece about a footballers diversion into hairdressing – unfortunately, given the nature of this article, this cannot be used as an indicator that more sources exist. wjematherplease leave a message...16:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. The only good piece of significant coverage I can see is the one identified and acknowledged by the nominator. Got some sources that demonstrate notability? Happy to take a look and reconsider if so.
MarchOfTheGreyhounds (
talk)
09:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
I think it's an automated reading of the entire page (as it originally existed) with headlines, weather, etc. Once you get to about the last minute, the article is read (nothing new at all compared to the text).
Jogurney (
talk)
16:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. If the only reason we have an article on someone in the first place is because they played a sport professionally, but the only nontrivial coverage of them is in a completely different mundane context and doesn't meet GNG, then further GNG-meeting coverage of the subject should not be presumed.
JoelleJay (
talk)
01:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.