From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Demario Richard (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Multiple issues here, but lets start with this article failing WP:Athlete. It also reads like a press release, and doesn't have any independent sourcing. AniMate 13:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. This article is in truly god-awful shape and desperately needs a rewrite. However, Demario Richard actually meets WP:GNG. He plays running back for a Power Five program and rushed for 1104 yards in 2015. A quick google search does turn a fair amount of significant coverage of the type required under GNG, e.g., (1) here, (2) here, (3) here, (4) here, (5) here, (6) here, (7) here, and (8) here. Cbl62 ( talk) 22:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
I cleaned it up a bit to get rid of some of the most egregious stuff. Cbl62 ( talk) 19:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Demario Richard (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Multiple issues here, but lets start with this article failing WP:Athlete. It also reads like a press release, and doesn't have any independent sourcing. AniMate 13:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. This article is in truly god-awful shape and desperately needs a rewrite. However, Demario Richard actually meets WP:GNG. He plays running back for a Power Five program and rushed for 1104 yards in 2015. A quick google search does turn a fair amount of significant coverage of the type required under GNG, e.g., (1) here, (2) here, (3) here, (4) here, (5) here, (6) here, (7) here, and (8) here. Cbl62 ( talk) 22:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
I cleaned it up a bit to get rid of some of the most egregious stuff. Cbl62 ( talk) 19:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook