The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article is about a locality within a city. While
WP:GEOLAND is applicable to the city, it is not applicable to the internal regions.
General notability criteria is applicable to such areas.
Delete as this is a really small area. Delhi is a city which contains the locality called
Rohini, Delhi. Rohini is notable and large enough to merit an article. Rohini is divided into sectors and Deep Vihar is an area within Rohini Sector 24. This is a really small area (a sub division of a sector) and it doesn't deserve an article. This is similar to what is the normal practice for Delhi geographical articles. We keep articles about localities, but not about the individual "sectors" and "pockets". For example
Dwarka, Delhi has an article, but the constituent sectors do not have their own articles.--
DreamLinker (
talk)
17:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)reply
erm... Not that it matters, but just to point out: Rohini is a city within Delhi state [or National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT)], and Dwarka is a subcity. —usernamekiran
(talk)23:30, 2 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Usernamekiran Rohini is not a city. There are no "cities" in Delhi (as in NCT Delhi). Officially there are only districts and each district has sub-districts (for municipal purposes). The term "sub-city" is generally used in parallel to the municipal subdivisions and is generally used to refer certain planned residential areas. Both Rohini and Dwarka are considered "sub-cities".--
DreamLinker (
talk)
06:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Fails GNG. Note that two of the present sources are unreliable per discussions at
WP:RSN and the third is tangential. -
Sitush (
talk)
09:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article is about a locality within a city. While
WP:GEOLAND is applicable to the city, it is not applicable to the internal regions.
General notability criteria is applicable to such areas.
Delete as this is a really small area. Delhi is a city which contains the locality called
Rohini, Delhi. Rohini is notable and large enough to merit an article. Rohini is divided into sectors and Deep Vihar is an area within Rohini Sector 24. This is a really small area (a sub division of a sector) and it doesn't deserve an article. This is similar to what is the normal practice for Delhi geographical articles. We keep articles about localities, but not about the individual "sectors" and "pockets". For example
Dwarka, Delhi has an article, but the constituent sectors do not have their own articles.--
DreamLinker (
talk)
17:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)reply
erm... Not that it matters, but just to point out: Rohini is a city within Delhi state [or National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCT)], and Dwarka is a subcity. —usernamekiran
(talk)23:30, 2 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Usernamekiran Rohini is not a city. There are no "cities" in Delhi (as in NCT Delhi). Officially there are only districts and each district has sub-districts (for municipal purposes). The term "sub-city" is generally used in parallel to the municipal subdivisions and is generally used to refer certain planned residential areas. Both Rohini and Dwarka are considered "sub-cities".--
DreamLinker (
talk)
06:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Fails GNG. Note that two of the present sources are unreliable per discussions at
WP:RSN and the third is tangential. -
Sitush (
talk)
09:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.