The result was merge into existing articles. Spinning Spark 03:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
This article has almost no information that is not already found on pages like 2012 Australian Open – Men's Singles and 2012 Australian Open – Women's Singles. Since there is almost no prose to go with it, this is merely a list of tables, which violates WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. Is an unnecessary content fork, and the few items of useful information can easily be included in the forementioned articles. MakeSense64 ( talk) 08:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I got an idea if it would work, you all tell me! I think we should template each day or all the days, which I would let you all decide what to do. If we template them se could make a navbox of them to allow people to get through the days and a category to boot, it would allow for seemless navigation or viewing. HotHat ( talk) 01:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
They cannot clearly be deleted because it would end the plot of the tornament and would not tell the full story without them or their inclusion. I would like all of you yelling prose, prose, prose to go and actually write some for once on a tennis article if it is that important to you look at Wikipedia law of complaints at the bottom of Raul's Laws of Wikipedia. This is my belief and what I have strived for if I want something done do it myself instead of complaining about it. By the way, these would fit on none of the articles, which are mostly draw articles, and these have different matches from varying draws. It must go back on the main article and it must get talked about on the Talk:2012 Australian Open article, not on some random deletion discussion. This deletion discussion sets a various dangerous president for wikipedia at-large not just with respect to these articles. It says that if you want any part of an article deleted make it into some sub article and advocate for the deletion of it. See it would impact more than just tennis! HotHat ( talk) 03:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
USER | PAGE | PROSE | MERGE |
---|---|---|---|
MakeSense64 | Page to be deleted | Prose needed | Merge |
Fyunck(click) | Page needed | Prose can certainly be added | Merge (if size permits) |
Ninney | Page needed | Prose not needed | Merge not a solution |
HotHat | Page needed | Prose to be written immediately | Merge |
Lajbi | Page to be deleted | Prose needed | ??? Merge ??? |
Thanks HotHat ! I will certainly start writing the prose - Ninney ( talk) 12:54, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was merge into existing articles. Spinning Spark 03:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply
This article has almost no information that is not already found on pages like 2012 Australian Open – Men's Singles and 2012 Australian Open – Women's Singles. Since there is almost no prose to go with it, this is merely a list of tables, which violates WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. Is an unnecessary content fork, and the few items of useful information can easily be included in the forementioned articles. MakeSense64 ( talk) 08:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I got an idea if it would work, you all tell me! I think we should template each day or all the days, which I would let you all decide what to do. If we template them se could make a navbox of them to allow people to get through the days and a category to boot, it would allow for seemless navigation or viewing. HotHat ( talk) 01:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC) reply
They cannot clearly be deleted because it would end the plot of the tornament and would not tell the full story without them or their inclusion. I would like all of you yelling prose, prose, prose to go and actually write some for once on a tennis article if it is that important to you look at Wikipedia law of complaints at the bottom of Raul's Laws of Wikipedia. This is my belief and what I have strived for if I want something done do it myself instead of complaining about it. By the way, these would fit on none of the articles, which are mostly draw articles, and these have different matches from varying draws. It must go back on the main article and it must get talked about on the Talk:2012 Australian Open article, not on some random deletion discussion. This deletion discussion sets a various dangerous president for wikipedia at-large not just with respect to these articles. It says that if you want any part of an article deleted make it into some sub article and advocate for the deletion of it. See it would impact more than just tennis! HotHat ( talk) 03:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply
USER | PAGE | PROSE | MERGE |
---|---|---|---|
MakeSense64 | Page to be deleted | Prose needed | Merge |
Fyunck(click) | Page needed | Prose can certainly be added | Merge (if size permits) |
Ninney | Page needed | Prose not needed | Merge not a solution |
HotHat | Page needed | Prose to be written immediately | Merge |
Lajbi | Page to be deleted | Prose needed | ??? Merge ??? |
Thanks HotHat ! I will certainly start writing the prose - Ninney ( talk) 12:54, 2 February 2012 (UTC) reply