The result was speedy keep the disambiguation page (which was never properly the subject of this AfD) now that the hijack of the page for another subject has been reverted. — David Eppstein ( talk) 01:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Violates all three policies in WP:BLP, and no sources cited. I've done a bit of good-faith research on the claims in the article and was unable to verify them. While this person does have a channel as described in the article, the content is minimum and not notable enough for an encyclopedic article. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 00:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep the disambiguation page (which was never properly the subject of this AfD) now that the hijack of the page for another subject has been reverted. — David Eppstein ( talk) 01:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Violates all three policies in WP:BLP, and no sources cited. I've done a bit of good-faith research on the claims in the article and was unable to verify them. While this person does have a channel as described in the article, the content is minimum and not notable enough for an encyclopedic article. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 00:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)