The result was delete. Can be recreated if reliable independent sources are found for other elements of his biography than the sex scandal. Sandstein 09:43, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Virtually all the information about this individual is sourced from PRIMARY sources which, per the notability guideline for individuals do not "count" towards notability. That leaves two areas where reliable sources do exist. First, his role as a minor witness to the assassination of Rehavam Ze'evi, which was so minor as not to even be mentioned in the primary article on that event (and could easily be mentioned there). Second, a very minor sex scandal (currently being EW'ed in and out of the article, thus the diff) in which he resigned from the pastorate of one church only to take up the pastorate of another. That's hardly the kind of thing about which to build an article upon and, if the Zeevi material is moved to the assassination article, this one comes close to not satisfying BLP1E (though there is some doubt about whether or not he should be considered a low-profile individual). Finally, let me note that I do not have a dog in this hunt: I came onto this as a Third Opinion project volunteer being asked to opine on whether or not the scandal information should be included. I think it should, but I have some grave doubt about whether it should be the only reliably-sourced thing which is included. TransporterMan ( TALK) 20:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Can be recreated if reliable independent sources are found for other elements of his biography than the sex scandal. Sandstein 09:43, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Virtually all the information about this individual is sourced from PRIMARY sources which, per the notability guideline for individuals do not "count" towards notability. That leaves two areas where reliable sources do exist. First, his role as a minor witness to the assassination of Rehavam Ze'evi, which was so minor as not to even be mentioned in the primary article on that event (and could easily be mentioned there). Second, a very minor sex scandal (currently being EW'ed in and out of the article, thus the diff) in which he resigned from the pastorate of one church only to take up the pastorate of another. That's hardly the kind of thing about which to build an article upon and, if the Zeevi material is moved to the assassination article, this one comes close to not satisfying BLP1E (though there is some doubt about whether or not he should be considered a low-profile individual). Finally, let me note that I do not have a dog in this hunt: I came onto this as a Third Opinion project volunteer being asked to opine on whether or not the scandal information should be included. I think it should, but I have some grave doubt about whether it should be the only reliably-sourced thing which is included. TransporterMan ( TALK) 20:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)