- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Datablender ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recording label tagged for notability since 2011. No external references. PROD removed by author (judging by username, COI) back in 2008. Judging by website, no activity since 2014. Renata ( talk) 02:16, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable record label. I can find no instances of a mention by an independent, reliable source. I have found three artists which mention Datablender in their discography or in an interview, but none of these artists are notable (have Wikipedia articles). No indication found that the label has made an impact on musical history or culture. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 12:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Datablender ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recording label tagged for notability since 2011. No external references. PROD removed by author (judging by username, COI) back in 2008. Judging by website, no activity since 2014. Renata ( talk) 02:16, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 04:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable record label. I can find no instances of a mention by an independent, reliable source. I have found three artists which mention Datablender in their discography or in an interview, but none of these artists are notable (have Wikipedia articles). No indication found that the label has made an impact on musical history or culture. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 12:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.