From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Darius Allen

Darius Allen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient evidence for notability. We have an article on the phone, DGG ( talk ) 00:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. WikiOriginal-9 ( talk) 21:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete -- promotionalism and no indications of being notable either as an entrepreneur or an author. Article cited to primary sources, passing mentions or other sources unsuitable for establishing notability. My searches do not turn up anything better. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete a non-notable businessman. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 13:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Sources are really about the company and its products, not the CEO. I don't see the necessary independent coverage of the individual to establish notability. Edgeweyes ( talk) 21:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Darius Allen

Darius Allen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient evidence for notability. We have an article on the phone, DGG ( talk ) 00:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. WikiOriginal-9 ( talk) 21:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete -- promotionalism and no indications of being notable either as an entrepreneur or an author. Article cited to primary sources, passing mentions or other sources unsuitable for establishing notability. My searches do not turn up anything better. K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete a non-notable businessman. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 13:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Sources are really about the company and its products, not the CEO. I don't see the necessary independent coverage of the individual to establish notability. Edgeweyes ( talk) 21:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook